Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-18 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I think this workflow works well. On 15 Jan 2014 22:17, "Paul Giblock" wrote: > Agreed, I'd rather discussion stay on the mailing lists. If someone has a > bug: sure, report it straight to the tracker. But, regarding developer > discussion, issues shouldn't be created until the discussion has le

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Got it will make amendments to the tags on the tracker. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Paul Giblock wrote: > Agreed, I'd rather discussion stay on the mailing lists. If someone has a > bug: sure, report it straight to the tracker. But, regarding developer > discussion, issues shouldn't be c

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-15 Thread Paul Giblock
Agreed, I'd rather discussion stay on the mailing lists. If someone has a bug: sure, report it straight to the tracker. But, regarding developer discussion, issues shouldn't be created until the discussion has led to concrete feature or bug requests. On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Tobiasz Kar

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-15 Thread Tobiasz Karoń
I'd prefer to stay here, as I'm gonna be cut off while on mobile and offline. I write and read here mostly this way. On 15 Jan 2014 16:53, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > From my experience, forums/trackers are not a great place to look for > active discussions any more. > > They can serve as a nice

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-15 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 15 January 2014 20:51, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Then I am in trouble as I posted my idea about the logic pro stuff in the > tracker already :( Don't worry, its okay what's done is done. :) -- Gurjot Singh Blog: http://bhattigurjot.wordpress.com ---

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Then I am in trouble as I posted my idea about the logic pro stuff in the tracker already :( On Wednesday 15 January 2014 20:49:15 Gurjot Singh wrote: > On 15 January 2014 20:46, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Good point, but i still feel right now with the community being so small > > it > > won

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-15 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 15 January 2014 20:46, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Good point, but i still feel right now with the community being so small it > wont be much of a problem to be honest. Let's see what others have to say about this. Only then we should decide what is best. -- Gurjot Singh Blog: http://bhattig

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-15 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Good point, but i still feel right now with the community being so small it wont be much of a problem to be honest. On Wednesday 15 January 2014 20:43:51 Gurjot Singh wrote: > On 15 January 2014 20:37, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Hey guys just an idea. > > > > Can we try and keep all discussio

Re: [LMMS-devel] [Lmms-users] Github issue tracker

2014-01-15 Thread Gurjot Singh
On 15 January 2014 20:37, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Hey guys just an idea. > > Can we try and keep all discussions on the issue tracker and i will create > another tag called discussion along side the enhancement/patch tag and if we > could tag any new discussions and or feature requests as such