Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-17 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Thanks for testing @musikBear. I'd like SecondFlight to confirm in #1198 . IIRC this is the bug preventing the release. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:23 AM, musikbear wrote: > Very good job! - RC8 is significantly bette

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-17 Thread musikbear
Very good job! - RC8 is significantly better! http://youtu.be/DfTshdrXZ4w Two runs perfectly at the same time, not one hickup! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/something-is-not-ok-with-rc-7-1-tp10817p10840.html Sent from the lmms-devel

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-17 Thread musikbear
diiz wrote > You should still be able to test the > performance just fine. Oki, good then -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/something-is-not-ok-with-rc-7-1-tp10817p10839.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-16 Thread Vesa
On 11/16/2014 01:21 PM, musikbear wrote: > diiz wrote >> Eh... you might want to build that again, I found a slight bug and fixed >> it. > will wait for that 2. build You can still test the 1st build, the bug is just an occasional segfault when enabling/disabling sends. You should still be able to

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-16 Thread musikbear
diiz wrote > Eh... you might want to build that again, I found a slight bug and fixed > it. will wait for that 2. build -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/something-is-not-ok-with-rc-7-1-tp10817p10829.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-15 Thread Vesa
On 11/15/2014 08:38 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Thanks. Here's the windows builds: > https://github.com/tresf/lmms/releases/tag/v1.0.97. Will try to test > tonight. Eh... you might want to build that again, I found a slight bug and fixed it. --

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-15 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Thanks. Here's the windows builds: https://github.com/tresf/lmms/releases/tag/v1.0.97. Will try to test tonight. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Vesa wrote: > On 11/15/2014 06:32 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > > > Thanks Vesa. I have a slower machine I can tes

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-15 Thread Vesa
On 11/15/2014 06:32 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > Thanks Vesa. I have a slower machine I can test stuff out on if it > cines to that. > Here you go: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/pull/1305 -- Comprehensive Server Monit

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-15 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Thanks Vesa. I have a slower machine I can test stuff out on if it cines to that. -- Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile pus

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-15 Thread Vesa
I'm now trying something fancy in stable-1.1 branch - I'm attempting to convert the FxMixer's threading model to a more efficient one, where the jobqueue is filled dynamically by atomic dependency counting - hopefully it results in less waiting... no promises yet. -

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-14 Thread Vesa
On 11/14/2014 08:42 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > Something must be wrong. CPU usage is way higher in 7.1 :/ ..damn > Allow me to say one thing: this is exactly why we need a paid developer. So we can get things like this solved. So we can keep our new features, and get even more new ones,

Re: [LMMS-devel] something is not ok with rc-7.1

2014-11-14 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> > Something must be wrong. CPU usage is way higher in 7.1 :/ ..damn I've noticed slightly higher usage as well, which is more noticeable on older machines. Perhaps Vesa has some feelings on this, but with my faster machines, I really don't have the lockups so its hard to pinpoint the cause. M