On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:16, Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:29PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 06:56, Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com
wrote:
On Wed, May
On 05/20/2015 18:24, Ciprian Barbu wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org wrote:
Simple example app creates one packet i/o to external interface
and one ipc pktio to other process. Then transfer packet from
external interface to other process and back
The changes look good to me.
-Original Message-
From: Maxim Uvarov [mailto:maxim.uva...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 12:47 PM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org; Steve Kordus (skordus)
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 1/2 v1] examples: ipsec: tunnel mode support
CC Steve, it he is
On 21 May 2015 at 13:22, Alexandru Badicioiu alexandru.badici...@linaro.org
wrote:
Hi,
would Netlink protocol (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3549) fit the
purpose
of ODP IPC (within a single OS instance)?
I interpret this as a question whether Netlink would be fit as an
implementation of the
I was referring to the Netlink protocol in itself, as a model for ODP MBUS
(or IPC).
The interaction between the FEC and the CPC, in the Netlink context,
defines a protocol. Netlink provides mechanisms for the CPC
(residing in user space) and the FEC (residing in kernel space) to
have
On 21 May 2015 at 11:50, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
petri.savolai...@nokia.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of ext
Ola Liljedahl
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:04 AM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject:
Hi,
would Netlink protocol (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3549) fit the
purpose of ODP IPC (within a single OS instance)?
Thanks,
Alex
On 21 May 2015 at 14:12, Ola Liljedahl ola.liljed...@linaro.org wrote:
On 21 May 2015 at 11:50, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of ext
Ola Liljedahl
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 1:04 AM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [lng-odp] [RFC] Add ipc.h
As promised, here is my first attempt at a standalone API for IPC - inter
On 21 May 2015 at 09:53, Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:28:24PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 16:16, Jerin Jacob jerin.ja...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:42:29PM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
On 20 May 2015
On 21 May 2015 at 15:56, Alexandru Badicioiu alexandru.badici...@linaro.org
wrote:
I got the impression that ODP MBUS API would define a transport
protocol/API between an ODP
No the MBUS API is just an API for message passing (think of the OSE IPC
API) and doesn't specify use cases or
I got the impression that ODP MBUS API would define a transport
protocol/API between an ODP application and a control plane application,
like TCP is the transport protocol for HTTP applications (e.g Web). Netlink
defines exactly that - transport protocol for configuration messages.
Maxim asked
On 21 May 2015 at 15:05, Alexandru Badicioiu alexandru.badici...@linaro.org
wrote:
I was referring to the Netlink protocol in itself, as a model for ODP
MBUS (or IPC).
Isn't the Netlink protocol what the endpoints send between them? This is
not specified by the ODP IPC/MBUS API, applications
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
---
helper/include/odp/helper/ring.h | 2 ++
helper/ring.c| 9 -
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/helper/include/odp/helper/ring.h b/helper/include/odp/helper/ring.h
index
Adding more params to pool create breaks original work.
Make sure that not set params are zero.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
---
platform/linux-generic/odp_schedule.c | 1 +
test/validation/odp_queue.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git
CC Steve, it he is not in mailing list.
Maxim.
On 05/19/2015 11:38, alexandru.badici...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Alexandru Badicioiu alexandru.badici...@linaro.org
v1 - added comment for tunnel DB entry use
Tunnel mode is enabled from the command line using -t argument with
the following
Merged,
Maxim.
On 05/19/2015 11:31, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote:
Suggested-by: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin nmo...@kalray.eu
---
platform/Makefile.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Hello Stuart,
please review that patch.
Thank you,
Maxim.
On 05/20/2015 12:31, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
Some platforms like DPDK and Cavium bare metal can not
dynamically destroy and create pool with the same name.
Keep pool destroy only in test suite termination to
make all other pktio tests
17 matches
Mail list logo
