Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] scripts/git_hash: match more digits

2016-05-02 Thread Ricardo Salveti
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Anders Roxell wrote: > Make it possible to match more digits than groups of one. > > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell > --- > scripts/git_hash.sh | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff

Re: [lng-odp] RFC: inter-process dynamic shared memory support.

2016-05-02 Thread Brian Brooks
Perhaps a fixed address somewhere below the fixed address used by the kernel when "the system chooses an address" can help solve this problem. On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:32 AM, Christophe Milard < christophe.mil...@linaro.org> wrote: > Thanks, Barry, > > I definitively think that is a good

[lng-odp] [PATCH] scripts/git_hash: match more digits

2016-05-02 Thread Anders Roxell
Make it possible to match more digits than groups of one. Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell --- scripts/git_hash.sh | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/scripts/git_hash.sh b/scripts/git_hash.sh index 6ba265e..336eb01 100755 ---

Re: [lng-odp] [GIT PULL ODPv4] running things in process mode

2016-05-02 Thread Brian Brooks
On 05/02 11:18:19, Christophe Milard wrote: > Hi Brian > > I have commented below, but it looks we need to talk. would you have time > after the linaro sync call today, for a HO? > Hi Christophe, Remaining comments from 'helper_abstraction_odp_thread' following our discussion. Brian > diff

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/2] doc: support ascidoctor

2016-05-02 Thread Bill Fischofer
For Part 1: Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Mike Holmes wrote: > ascidoctor is a python asciidoc interpreter it has greater capabilities > than asciidoc which is a perl based interpreter > > The resulting style

Re: [lng-odp] odp_api.h missing in ODP 1.9 package

2016-05-02 Thread Anders Roxell
On 2 May 2016 at 12:33, Oriol Arcas wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that odp_api.h is missing in the new packages for ODP 1.9. > > In ODP 1.8: > > $> dpkg-deb -c > libodp108-dev_1.8.0.0.git28.g4fc79fc-1.linarojessie.1_amd64.deb | grep > odp_api.h > -rw-r--r-- root/root

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv2] CHANGELOG: Update for v1.10.0.0

2016-05-02 Thread Mike Holmes
Are there any more updates anyone needs to get into the release notes ? On 30 April 2016 at 19:13, Bill Fischofer wrote: > From: Mike Holmes > > Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes > Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] helper: remove unused odph_linux_process_fork API

2016-05-02 Thread Krishna Garapati
On 2 May 2016 at 13:47, Mike Holmes wrote: > odph_linux_process_fork is not used by any ODP example or test, it is also > untested by the helper test suite. > Just for the note, we use this api currently in our nginx_ofp app. > > odph_linux_process_fork is a wrapper for

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH v2] doc/users-quide: correct timer API section

2016-05-02 Thread Bill Fischofer
ping. Are we expecting a v2 of this patch? On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Bill Fischofer wrote: > General comment: This explanation could benefit considerably from the > inclusion of a state diagram like that used for the pktio documentation. > Here's the suggested

[lng-odp] [PATCH] helper: remove unused odph_linux_process_fork API

2016-05-02 Thread Mike Holmes
odph_linux_process_fork is not used by any ODP example or test, it is also untested by the helper test suite. odph_linux_process_fork is a wrapper for odph_linux_process_fork_n so just delete this, the impact if there are any users is very small. Signed-off-by: Mike Holmes

[lng-odp] odp_api.h missing in ODP 1.9 package

2016-05-02 Thread Oriol Arcas
Hello, I noticed that odp_api.h is missing in the new packages for ODP 1.9. In ODP 1.8: $> dpkg-deb -c libodp108-dev_1.8.0.0.git28.g4fc79fc-1.linarojessie.1_amd64.deb | grep odp_api.h -rw-r--r-- root/root 1458 2016-03-28 21:04 ./usr/include/odp_api.h While in ODP 1.9: $> dpkg-deb -c

Re: [lng-odp] [GIT PULL ODPv4] running things in process mode

2016-05-02 Thread Christophe Milard
Hi Brian I have commented below, but it looks we need to talk. would you have time after the linaro sync call today, for a HO? On 29 April 2016 at 23:49, Brian Brooks wrote: > On 04/29 13:29:03, Christophe Milard wrote: > > On 29 April 2016 at 00:48, Brian Brooks