Cannot see them here when doing normal builds. you must be more
accurate on what you do. Moreover, these warnings seems to relate to
helper tests, which this serie doesn't touch.
confused.
/C
On 15 July 2016 at 05:21, Christophe Milard
wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
> Warning
Hi Maxim,
Warning when doing what?
On 14 July 2016 at 22:31, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> I see that warnings:
>
> helper/test/Makefile.am:27: warning: variable 'dist_chksum_SOURCES' is
> defined but no program or
> helper/test/Makefile.am:27: library has 'chksum' as canonical
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2429
Bug ID: 2429
Summary: validation thread_main fails process mode
Product: OpenDataPlane - linux- generic reference
Version: v1.10.1
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status:
Add odph_ prefix to udp_or_tcp_hdr_t and rename structure odph_l4_hdr_t.
Signed-off-by: Khalil Blaiech
---
helper/chksum.c | 51 +--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/helper/chksum.c
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell
---
example/ipsec/Makefile.am | 18 +-
example/ipsec/{run_ah_in => odp_ipsec_run_ah_in} | 0
example/ipsec/{run_ah_out => odp_ipsec_run_ah_out} | 0
example/ipsec/{run_both_in =>
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell
---
example/time/.gitignore | 2 +-
example/time/Makefile.am | 8
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/example/time/.gitignore b/example/time/.gitignore
index 3106aea..938c1aa 100644
---
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell
---
helper/test/Makefile.am | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/helper/test/Makefile.am b/helper/test/Makefile.am
index e9e8785..545db73 100644
--- a/helper/test/Makefile.am
+++ b/helper/test/Makefile.am
@@
This is preparation cleanup so installed executables are scoped
and helpers are removed as unhelpful for the final installation.
v2, fixes a issue that Maxim reported with:
helper/test/Makefile.am:27: warning: variable 'dist_chksum_SOURCES' is defined
but no program or
Merged,
Maxim.
On 07/14/16 03:23, Bill Fischofer wrote:
The ODP version of the _ring_create() routine does not use a socket_id
parameter, so remove the doxygen that refers to it to resolve Bug
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2413
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer
I see that warnings:
helper/test/Makefile.am:27: warning: variable 'dist_chksum_SOURCES' is
defined but no program or
helper/test/Makefile.am:27: library has 'chksum' as canonical name
(possible typo)
helper/test/Makefile.am:28: warning: variable 'dist_odpthreads_SOURCES'
is defined but no
Make print for example more platform independent and move
prints about pktio states in platform initialization code.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov
Reviewed-by: Bill Fischofer
---
v2: - for netmap did not add pktio_init_global to functions
Hello,
Can somebody else confirm that ./scripts/build-pktio-dpdk script is broken?
I.e. now I see that script compiles dpdk and odp but it does not compile
dpdk pktio for odp for some reason.
config.log says that there is no -ldpdk. But ./configure passes to the
end and returns 0.
Maxim.
Thanks, Oriol. Good catch.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Oriol Arcas
wrote:
> The API states that the return values of odp_tm_enq() and
> odp_tm_enq_with_cnt() are different (the former returns 0 on success),
> but the implementations of both were identical.
>
>
I think general pcap file support is likely to prove useful in all sorts of
ways. Validation testing (especially for error cases) is certainly one
area. Flow routing should be another since packets may only partially touch
cores so how do we test that an IPSec packet can be input and received by a
This approach of using a pcap file might be useful to recreate an
error scenario but IMO it will be difficult to maintain different pcap
file for test cases.
Is this method proposed for validation testing or for flow testing?
Regards,
Bala
On 14 July 2016 at 18:42, Bill Fischofer
The API states that the return values of odp_tm_enq() and
odp_tm_enq_with_cnt() are different (the former returns 0 on success),
but the implementations of both were identical.
Signed-off-by: Oriol Arcas
---
platform/linux-generic/odp_traffic_mngr.c | 7 ++-
1
In many cases it is becasue the scripts do not add the current directory
containing the executables to the path, I just fixed that in crypto
examples and will send when Anders patches make it in
On 14 July 2016 at 09:08, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> Ok, make followed by
Ok, make followed by make check looks like it works:
make check-TESTS
make[4]: Entering directory
'/home/bill/linaro/maxim/test/platform/linux-generic'
make[5]: Entering directory
'/home/bill/linaro/maxim/test/platform/linux-generic'
PASS: pktio/pktio_run.sh
SKIP: pktio/pktio_run_tap.sh
PASS:
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2212
Mike Holmes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED
On 07/14/16 14:50, Bill Fischofer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:29 AM, Maxim Uvarov > wrote:
On 07/13/16 22:32, Bill Fischofer wrote:
This applies and compiles fine, but I'm not sure how I'm
supposed to run it.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2410
Mike Holmes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2412
Mike Holmes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2415
Mike Holmes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2425
--- Comment #1 from Mike Holmes ---
Is this worth adding an ODP_ASSERT that runs in debug mode to test the procfs
values ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2426
--- Comment #2 from Mike Holmes ---
Can strncmp be used to limit the bytes to be compared
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2427
Mike Holmes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2366
Mike Holmes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|High|Highest
--- Comment #5
For this series:
Reviewd-by: Mike Holmes
On 14 July 2016 at 01:18, Yi He wrote:
> For this series:
>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Yi He
>
> Best Regards, Yi
>
> On 14 July 2016 at 03:52, Bill Fischofer
>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:29 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> On 07/13/16 22:32, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>> This applies and compiles fine, but I'm not sure how I'm supposed to run
>> it. Does this require sudo? Neither with or without seems to work for me:
>>
>> I do not see
On 14 July 2016 at 04:29, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On 07/13/16 22:32, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>> This applies and compiles fine, but I'm not sure how I'm supposed to run
>> it. Does this require sudo? Neither with or without seems to work for me:
>>
>> I do not see in
Merged,
patches 2 and 3 to master.
Patch 1/3 to api-next, then to next.
Maxim.
On 07/13/16 19:59, Bill Fischofer wrote:
From: Barry Spinney
This todo just asks a question which is no longer important.
Signed-off-by: Barry Spinney
Signed-off-by:
On 07/13/16 22:32, Bill Fischofer wrote:
This applies and compiles fine, but I'm not sure how I'm supposed to
run it. Does this require sudo? Neither with or without seems to
work for me:
I do not see in your output that pcap pktio was compiled in (no open for
it). In that case code should
32 matches
Mail list logo