https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2873
Bug ID: 2873
Summary: code coverage odp_timer_wheel.c
Product: OpenDataPlane - linux- generic reference
Version: v1.13.0.0
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
This builds and reads well to me, I think that when the ABI an other
issues on what helpers are gets ironed out, we will need to have some
words about what the helpers are in relation to the ODP API. Helpers
are part of the interface we present in outside world, our examples
and tests use them.
I
On 3 February 2017 at 12:11, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Will it be ok that instead of reply to email thread that patch was
> merged, there will me automatic merge messages like bellow?
> Does somebody have objections?
This is assured to automatically give an indication to the
Will it be ok that instead of reply to email thread that patch was
merged, there will me automatic merge messages like bellow?
Does somebody have objections?
Maxim.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [Linaro/odp] 25ed19: abi: event: added the first ABI spec file
Date: Fri, 03 Feb
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2872
Bug ID: 2872
Summary: odp_pktio_ordered_run.sh: line 34: [: : integer
expression expected
Product: OpenDataPlane - linux- generic reference
Version: v1.13.0.0
Hardware: Other
Merged,
Maxim.
On 02/03/17 10:46, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> Ping. I have next patch set ready (for packet accessor function inline), just
> waiting for this to be merged first.
>
> -Petri
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bill Fischofer
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> yes, the point it that classier or pktio should pass BPDUs and drop other
> packets without cpu load if that possible...
>
The ODP APIs are designed to be used by SW either to process packets
or to configure the
> -Original Message-
> From: Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 3:37 PM
> To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) labs.com>
> Cc: LNG ODP Mailman List
> Subject: Re:
Do we have any performance comparison between using this new API
compared to using the existing API and the SW behind
odp_schedule_multi() sorts the events (if necessary) and only returns
events for one queue at a time (keeping the others as prescheduled
events)?
If we don't know that this new
On 3 February 2017 at 14:11, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 2:29 PM
>> To: Petri Savolainen
> -Original Message-
> From: Christophe Milard [mailto:christophe.mil...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2017 2:29 PM
> To: Petri Savolainen
> Cc: LNG ODP Mailman List
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH 1/2] helper: linux:
On 3 February 2017 at 07:59, Sorin Vultureanu wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> My understanding is that you want to remove helper lib, so I have some points
> why that would be a bad idea:
Not remove helpers, just remove the unused linux spcific API, the
abstract one will
Hi Mike,
My understanding is that you want to remove helper lib, so I have some points
why that would be a bad idea:
1. We use these helpers as abstraction layer. The fact that you remove them
will add load to change things in OFP. Probably, we will be forced to reuse
your deleted code as it
Adds test case for ipv6 source and destination address matching
Signed-off-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
---
.../validation/api/classification/classification.h | 21 ++
.../api/classification/odp_classification_common.c | 149 ++-
Adds test case for ipv6 source and destination address matching
Signed-off-by: Balasubramanian Manoharan
---
v3: performance enhancement using bitwise AND for ip address mask
.../include/odp_classification_datamodel.h | 11 -
On 3 February 2017 at 07:28, Christophe Milard
wrote:
> On 3 February 2017 at 12:23, Petri Savolainen
> wrote:
>> There's no platform specific helpers. Helpers may depend on
>> Linux and make it easier to do common series of Linux system
On 3 February 2017 at 12:23, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> There's no platform specific helpers. Helpers may depend on
> Linux and make it easier to do common series of Linux system
> calls. These kind of helpers are grouped into helper/linux
> directory.
This is getting
Is this a duplicate of http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/8030/
On 3 February 2017 at 06:24, Petri Savolainen
wrote:
> This suppress excessive amount of doxygen warnings caused by
> missing helper documentation. Other more improtant warnings
> may go unnoticed if
There's no platform specific helpers. Helpers may depend on
Linux and make it easier to do common series of Linux system
calls. These kind of helpers are grouped into helper/linux
directory.
Use --enable-helper-linux configuration option to enable
support for Linux helpers.
Signed-off-by: Petri
This suppress excessive amount of doxygen warnings caused by
missing helper documentation. Other more improtant warnings
may go unnoticed if these warning fill the screen.
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen
---
helper/include/odp/helper/odph_cuckootable.h | 52
20 matches
Mail list logo