Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH API-NEXT v5 5/9] test: validation: add IPsec API testsuite

2017-07-24 23:00 GMT+08:00 Github ODP bot : > From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > Add several basic tests for IPsec API. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > --- > /** Email created from pull request

Re: [lng-odp] PKTIO and classification

On 26 July 2017 at 01:24, Liron Himi wrote: > Hi, > > I have a few questions/clarifications regarding classification in PKTIO: > > 1. As part of the 'odp_pktin_queue_param_t' application should set > 'classifier_enable' to '1' if classification support is wanted. Is

[lng-odp] [PATCH v1 1/2] linux-gen: fdserver: fix fdserver work if ODP_SHM_DIR is exported

From: Maxim Uvarov If ODP_SHM_DIR=/tmp is exported shmem test failed due to searching in wrong path. Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov --- /** Email created from pull request 88 (muvarov:master_fix_odp_shm_dir) **

[lng-odp] [PATCH v1 2/2] travis: add check for ODP_SHM_DIR

From: Maxim Uvarov Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov --- /** Email created from pull request 88 (muvarov:master_fix_odp_shm_dir) ** https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/88 ** Patch: https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/88.patch ** Base sha:

[lng-odp] [PATCH v1 0/2] fix odp shm dir

fix odp shm dir. That also I hope will make Linaro CI happy with using ODP_SHM_DIR under docker. github /** Email created from pull request 88 (muvarov:master_fix_odp_shm_dir) ** https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/88 ** Patch:

[lng-odp] [PATCH v1 1/1] travis: enable ccache and pip cache

From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov --- /** Email created from pull request 89 (lumag:cache) ** https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/89 ** Patch: https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/89.patch

[lng-odp] [PATCH v1 0/1] travis: enable ccache and pip cache

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org github /** Email created from pull request 89 (lumag:cache) ** https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/89 ** Patch: https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/89.patch ** Base sha:

Re: [lng-odp] merge master to api-next

Updated pull request. Let's see what test will show. Maxim. On 07/26/17 22:19, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > On 26/07/17 22:04, Bill Fischofer wrote: >> I guess another question is why doesn't this issue show up in api-next >> without this patch series or in master by itself? > > Because we

Re: [lng-odp] merge master to api-next

On 26/07/17 22:04, Bill Fischofer wrote: > I guess another question is why doesn't this issue show up in api-next > without this patch series or in master by itself? Because we do not (yet) have cross-compilation testing in api-next in Travis. And master branch doesn't have this code also. > >

Re: [lng-odp] merge master to api-next

I guess another question is why doesn't this issue show up in api-next without this patch series or in master by itself? On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov < dmitry.ereminsoleni...@linaro.org> wrote: > Brian, > > > On 20 July 2017 at 00:23, Brian Brooks

Re: [lng-odp] merge master to api-next

Brian, On 20 July 2017 at 00:23, Brian Brooks wrote: > On 07/26 10:29:41, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: >> On 26/07/17 01:00, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >> > Merge request is: >> > >> > https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/71 >> > >> > 2 arm build fails with errors. >> >> Both are

Re: [lng-odp] merge master to api-next

On 07/26 10:29:41, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote: > On 26/07/17 01:00, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > > Merge request is: > > > > https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/71 > > > > 2 arm build fails with errors. > > Both are due to scalable scheduler code. Neither are due to scalable scheduler. They are

[lng-odp] JIRA cards for ODP Cloud development

Hello, I have created the JIRA tickets for DPDK integration in the modular framework. I have noted them down in the document: https://docs.google.com/a/linaro.org/document/d/1TV1QNCgyUu2rL_gMobzPHhqJI8wzUdgqqXnb8NCeiSg/edit?usp=sharing. I have added the effort as well. These are my

Re: [lng-odp] ODP initialization: instance and multiple processes

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 7:56 AM, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > On 07/26/2017 02:48 PM, Stanisław Kardach wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have been working on implementing a certain ODP platform that may allow >> users to create applications constructed from multiple processes

Re: [lng-odp] ODP initialization: instance and multiple processes

On 07/26/2017 02:48 PM, Stanisław Kardach wrote: Hi all, I have been working on implementing a certain ODP platform that may allow users to create applications constructed from multiple processes (without a single parent) that would "join" together and start working as a single instance with a

[lng-odp] ODP initialization: instance and multiple processes

Hi all, I have been working on implementing a certain ODP platform that may allow users to create applications constructed from multiple processes (without a single parent) that would "join" together and start working as a single instance with a shared HW resource pool. My question is on the

Re: [lng-odp] merge master to api-next

On 26/07/17 01:00, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > Merge request is: > > https://github.com/Linaro/odp/pull/71 > > 2 arm build fails with errors. Both are due to scalable scheduler code. > > 1. > > https://travis-ci.org/muvarov/odp/jobs/257478037 > CC odp_rwlock.lo > :1:2: error: instruction