On 10.12.15 08:42, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
Going to apply this patch to unblock builds in new distros. Any objections?
Maxim.
I worry about change of timespec struct can break linux-generic time API.
I believe it will not happen, but that's why I like Maxim`s approach a little
more.
[lng-odp]
> Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer
> ---
> .../linux-generic/include/odp/plat/time_types.h| 5 +++-
> platform/linux-generic/odp_time.c | 27 +
> -
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of EXT Ola
Liljedahl
Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 6:26 PM
To: Bill Fischofer
Cc: LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] linux-generic: time: remove posix bleed
through on odp_time_t
On 9 December
On 12/10/2015 11:21, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer
---
.../linux-generic/include/odp/plat/time_types.h| 5 +++-
platform/linux-generic/odp_time.c | 27 +
-
2 files changed, 20
From: EXT Ola Liljedahl [mailto:ola.liljed...@linaro.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 12:40 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
Cc: Bill Fischofer; LNG ODP Mailman List
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] linux-generic: time: remove posix bleed
through on odp_time_t
On 10
On 10 December 2015 at 09:40, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On 12/10/2015 11:21, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Bill Fischofer
>>> ---
>>> .../linux-generic/include/odp/plat/time_types.h| 5 +++-
>>>
Bill Fischofer
> *Cc:* LNG ODP Mailman List
> *Subject:* Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH] linux-generic: time: remove
> posix bleed through on odp_time_t
>
>
>
> On 9 December 2015 at 16:53, Bill Fischofer <bill.fischo...@linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
> The li
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
>
>
> On 10.12.15 08:42, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
>
>> Going to apply this patch to unblock builds in new distros. Any
>> objections?
>>
>> Maxim.
>>
>
> I worry about change of timespec struct can break
Is anyone following the OFP project, they are also discussing this struct
from a user of ODPs perspctive on a couple of threads like
http://www.openfastpath.org/pipermail/openfastpath/2015-December/48.html
On 10 December 2015 at 08:07, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
>
>
>
Thanks. I'll pop over to that thread to take a look. However odp_time_t
should be opaque from a user perspective--that's the purpose of having
abstract types in the first place.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Mike Holmes wrote:
> Is anyone following the OFP project,
On 9 December 2015 at 16:53, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
> The linux-generic implementation of odp_time_t makes use of POSIX
> APIs that are sensitive to the _POSIX_C_SOURCE level. Use an indirection
> mechanism so that these dependencies do not "bleed through" the ODP API.
The linux-generic implementation of odp_time_t makes use of POSIX
APIs that are sensitive to the _POSIX_C_SOURCE level. Use an indirection
mechanism so that these dependencies do not "bleed through" the ODP API.
This means that ODP applications can be independent of _POSIX_C_SOURCE
level.
Going to apply this patch to unblock builds in new distros. Any objections?
Maxim.
On 12/09/2015 19:25, Ola Liljedahl wrote:
On 9 December 2015 at 16:53, Bill Fischofer > wrote:
The linux-generic implementation of odp_time_t
13 matches
Mail list logo