https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #11 from Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org ---
Will close this next week if there is no update
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Bill Fischofer bill.fischo...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mike.hol...@linaro.org
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #9 from Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org ---
Petri started reworking the scheduler for linux-generic, but I will have to
check if the bug is still present.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #8 from Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org ---
Just one addition, if an empty queue is selected the current set of queues is
abandoned (j++, id++), which is wrong because there might be another queue in
the set which is not empty.
--
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #7 from Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org ---
That's exactly the problem. When an empty queue is selected the existing code
increments the two ids and thus selects the next set of queues. This is ok as
long as there is at least one
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #5 from Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org ---
If you look at the thread containing the two patches mentioned in the
description you can see I had absolutely no response from anyone. I pinged Ola
and Petri yesterday, but I had no
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #6 from Ola Liljedahl ola.liljed...@linaro.org ---
The second patch (42313), is this because continue (when the loop detects
empty queues) would incorrectly perform the increments (j++, id++). By moving
them to the end of the loop body,
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|mike.hol...@linaro.org |ciprian.ba...@linaro.org
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
--- Comment #2 from Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org ---
I wanted to include this test in the scheduler testsuite, I had it in my local
sources before submitting the patch, but when I discovered it I was running it
on multiple threads and I
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Ola Liljedahl ola.liljed...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1001
Taras Kondratiuk taras.kondrat...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
14 matches
Mail list logo
