Re: [lng-odp] [EXT] Re: ODP1.15 with gcc-linaro-5.3.1

2017-10-25 Thread Liron Himi
issue with GCC5.3.1 I currently removed the new lines that add latomic to the game. Liron From: Bill Fischofer [mailto:bill.fischo...@linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 23:42 To: Liron Himi Cc: Brian Brooks ; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [EXT] Re: ODP1.15 with gcc-

Re: [lng-odp] [EXT] Re: ODP1.15 with gcc-linaro-5.3.1

2017-10-25 Thread Bill Fischofer
Hi Liron, Can you try this against the master or api-next branches of odp.git? I know we are currently doing cross-compile testing for aarch64 in Travis and aren't seeing this problem. If that's the case then this problem should resolve itself in the next tagged release, which should be out within

Re: [lng-odp] [EXT] Re: ODP1.15 with gcc-linaro-5.3.1

2017-10-25 Thread Liron Himi
Hi, The GCC5.3.1 is a Linaro's GCC, maybe it is more of a question to Linaro as this crosstools version doesn't compile well with the linux-generic implementation in ODP1.15 due to the need for libatomic. Liron -Original Message- From: Brian Brooks [mailto:brian.bro...@linaro.org] Sen

Re: [lng-odp] [EXT] Re: ODP1.15 with gcc-linaro-5.3.1

2017-10-18 Thread Brian Brooks
checking for GCC atomic builtins... yes checking whether -latomic is needed for 64-bit atomic built-ins... no checking whether -latomic is needed for 128-bit atomic built-ins... yes So, GCC 5.3.1 will not lower __atomic/__sync builtins on a 128-bit data type to machine instructions, and instead em

Re: [lng-odp] [EXT] Re: ODP1.15 with gcc-linaro-5.3.1

2017-10-18 Thread Liron Himi
Hi Brian, I attached full configure output. Liron -Original Message- From: Brian Brooks [mailto:brian.bro...@linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 18:50 To: Liron Himi Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: [EXT] Re: [lng-odp] ODP1.15 with gcc-linaro-5.3.1 External Email -