Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-21 Thread Maxim Uvarov
On 04/21/16 11:18, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote: -Original Message- From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of EXT Maxim Uvarov Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 7:04 PM To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-21 Thread Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> -Original Message- > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of EXT > Maxim Uvarov > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 7:04 PM > To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration > >

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-20 Thread Maxim Uvarov
that patch is not part of current series, please skip it. Other 2 paches are good for review. Maxim. On 04/20/16 19:02, Maxim Uvarov wrote: From: Petri Savolainen Time test duration was almost a minute on a 2.6GHz CPU. Combined local and global time monotonity

[lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-20 Thread Maxim Uvarov
From: Petri Savolainen Time test duration was almost a minute on a 2.6GHz CPU. Combined local and global time monotonity tests, so that the there is only single run of the long wait loop. Shortened wait test time to 3 seconds and long loop into roughly 14 seconds on a

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-19 Thread Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> -Original Message- > From: EXT Ivan Khoronzhuk [mailto:ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org] > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 3:53 PM > To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com>; > lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] valida

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-18 Thread Ivan Khoronzhuk
Hi, Petri Tests are sorted in the order of API usage, one by one. The monotony test is placed before others, because before testing rest time APIs we should be sure in monotony. Now when you've combined them the placement of monotony at least for one of the type is not correct. For instance,

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-15 Thread Ivan Khoronzhuk
EXT Ivan Khoronzhuk [mailto:ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 5:39 PM To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com>; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration What about to do smth like below

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-15 Thread Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration > > What about to do smth like below > (I didn't normalize it to ns...but that are tehnical details) > > uint64_t c1, c2; > uint64_t loop_time; > > c1 =

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-14 Thread Ivan Khoronzhuk
onzhuk [mailto:ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 5:00 PM To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com>; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration Hi, Petri. As far I remember you was OK to i

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-14 Thread Ivan Khoronzhuk
; lng-odp@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration Hi, Petri. As far I remember you was OK to increase time of testing on even more time. It was supposed to include future freqs...I know, for now it's not correct.. but anyway. Also I dislike the idea t

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-14 Thread Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
ay, April 14, 2016 5:00 PM > To: Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <petri.savolai...@nokia.com>; > lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration > > Hi, Petri. > > As far I remember you was OK to increase time of testing

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-14 Thread Ivan Khoronzhuk
Hi, Petri. As far I remember you was OK to increase time of testing on even more time. It was supposed to include future freqs...I know, for now it's not correct.. but anyway. Also I dislike the idea to combine two separate tests in one function. Yes, it makes tests faster, but doesn't reflect

[lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: time: shorten test duration

2016-04-14 Thread Petri Savolainen
Time test duration was almost a minute on a 2.6GHz CPU. Combined local and global time monotonity tests, so that the there is only single run of the long wait loop. Shortened wait test time to 3 seconds and long loop into roughly 14 seconds on a 2.6GHz CPU. There should be enough head room to keep