[lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: use PRIu32 instead of %u to print uint32_t variables

2015-04-22 Thread Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin nmo...@kalray.eu --- This triggers some warnings in checkpatch about long string and multi-line strings. Seeing the latest debate about split string vs 80 cols, I tried to keep the same format. If you want me to fix it one way opr the other, please let

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: use PRIu32 instead of %u to print uint32_t variables

2015-04-22 Thread Mike Holmes
On 22 April 2015 at 10:17, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin nmo...@kalray.eu wrote: Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin nmo...@kalray.eu Reviewed-and-tested-by: Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org --- This triggers some warnings in checkpatch about long string and multi-line strings.

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: use PRIu32 instead of %u to print uint32_t variables

2015-04-22 Thread Bill Fischofer
This is a good change. We should adopt global use of PRIu32 and PRIu64 throughout linux-generic (and odp-dpdk) for maximum portability. On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org wrote: On 22 April 2015 at 10:17, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin nmo...@kalray.eu wrote: