Re: [lng-odp] odp_cpumask_default_worker() and availability of the returned CPU's

2016-04-20 Thread Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> -Original Message- > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of EXT > Ivan Khoronzhuk > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 6:49 PM > To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org > Subject: Re: [lng-odp] odp_cpumask_default_worker() and availability of &g

Re: [lng-odp] odp_cpumask_default_worker() and availability of the returned CPU's

2016-04-19 Thread Ivan Khoronzhuk
On 19.04.16 18:31, Zoltan Kiss wrote: Hi, A quick question: my understanding is that odp_cpumask_default_worker() returns the available CPU's, but it doesn't guarantee that when you start your thread's/processes they will be still available, right? It should be the applications

[lng-odp] odp_cpumask_default_worker() and availability of the returned CPU's

2016-04-19 Thread Zoltan Kiss
Hi, A quick question: my understanding is that odp_cpumask_default_worker() returns the available CPU's, but it doesn't guarantee that when you start your thread's/processes they will be still available, right? It should be the applications responsibility to not start more threads than it