ject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv7 2/5] linux-generic: packet:
> implement reference
> apis
>
> First off, thank you very much for this review.
>
> Please note that this code has been streamlined in patch
> http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/7879/ a
Add simple, copy based
>>> implementation first and continue development/optimization from there. So,
>>> that we can step back and compare easily with previous version, if e.g.
>>> race conditions are found.
>>>
>>> -Petri
>>>
>>>
>
tep back and compare easily with previous version, if e.g.
>> race conditions are found.
>>
>> -Petri
>>
>>
>> > -Original Message-----
>> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
>> Bill
>> > Fischofer
>>
g.
> race conditions are found.
>
> -Petri
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Bill
> > Fischofer
> > Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 6:28 PM
> > To: Francois Ozog <francoi
nal Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of Bill
> Fischofer
> Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 6:28 PM
> To: Francois Ozog <francois.o...@linaro.org>
> Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCHv7 2/5] linux-g
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Francois Ozog
wrote:
> Well, problem is still there.
> You are doing something on a packet that may not exist anymore.
>
Can you elaborate? The bug fix patch eliminates the race condition that
Janne pointed out because no thread
Well, problem is still there.
You are doing something on a packet that may not exist anymore.
On 17 February 2017 at 22:08, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
> I've posted patch http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/8155/ to
> address this issue. It goes on api-next on top of
I've posted patch http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/8155/ to
address this issue. It goes on api-next on top of patches
http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/7879/ and
http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/8154/
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 2:39 PM, Bill Fischofer
First off, thank you very much for this review.
Please note that this code has been streamlined in patch
http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/7879/ and has been further
refined with patch http://patches.opendataplane.org/patch/8145/ but
the exposure you identify still exists in that code.
On
Hi,
I took a look at the packet references and it seems to me that
either the implementation is a bit racy or I confused myself
when reading the code. Or maybe I got the intended concurrency
semantics of the packet references wrong?
My first issue is that packet_free() may access freed packet
10 matches
Mail list logo