Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv10 3/3] configure.ac update version numbers

2016-12-01 Thread Anders Roxell
On 2016-12-01 17:29, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > On 12/01/16 17:25, Mike Holmes wrote: > >Thanks Steve > > > >In an effort to close on this > > > >Steve and Anders both say it should be > > > >-ODPHELPER_LIBSO_VERSION=110:0:1 > >+ODPHELPER_LIBSO_VERSION=110:1:1 > > > >And they are our best resourse I

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv10 3/3] configure.ac update version numbers

2016-12-01 Thread Maxim Uvarov
On 12/01/16 17:25, Mike Holmes wrote: Thanks Steve In an effort to close on this Steve and Anders both say it should be -ODPHELPER_LIBSO_VERSION=110:0:1 +ODPHELPER_LIBSO_VERSION=110:1:1 And they are our best resourse I consider my self educated :) Maxim / Anders can we take the CURL text

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv10 3/3] configure.ac update version numbers

2016-12-01 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:05:14PM +0300, Maxim Uvarov wrote: >On 12/01/16 01:09, Anders Roxell wrote: >> Since the ABI isn't changed we shouldn't bump the age only the revision. >> The curl project [1] describes the rules in a easier way. >> >>[1]

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv10 3/3] configure.ac update version numbers

2016-11-30 Thread Anders Roxell
On 30 November 2016 at 22:02, Mike Holmes wrote: > I just CC'ed you in Steve. > > My head is spinning but I think we have this straight now, perhaps you have > time to sync with Maxim and possibly Anders if he has time to check this > from ytour Debian background? > > I

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv10 3/3] configure.ac update version numbers

2016-11-30 Thread Mike Holmes
I just CC'ed you in Steve. My head is spinning but I think we have this straight now, perhaps you have time to sync with Maxim and possibly Anders if he has time to check this from ytour Debian background? I think if we can get the next couple of release out correctly the pattern will establish