Hi,
I agree completely for the odp_buffer_t which is returned by odp_schedule
that the barrier should be maintained by the implementation. But what about
the user meta data which is added as a pointer to the odp_buffer_t this
data is linked with the buffer by the application. Since the user meta
From: ext Mike Holmes [mailto:mike.hol...@linaro.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 11:53 PM
To: Savolainen, Petri (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Cc: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH v2] test/unit: add odp_buffer_test
On 1 September 2014 03:44, Savolainen, Petri (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Patch to test multi-queue support on ODP-DPDK without with multi-queue.
Tested-by : Santosh Shukla santosh.shu...@linaro.org
On 3 September 2014 16:10, Santosh Shukla santosh.shu...@linaro.org wrote:
Confirmed. It is working.
On 1 September 2014 14:09, Venkatesh Vivekanandan
On 09/03/2014 02:48 PM, Venkatesh Vivekanandan wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Can you please add the Tested-by to the below commit,
I can not change existence commits. But we can have this for record in
mailing list.
Maxim.
commit e9e7bc237086d6d07dc004e591063838a12563ed
Author: Venkatesh
Thanks Jerin. This is something we can perhaps discuss in more detail
during next week's ODP call and/or at LCU. The ODP design point is
multicore SoCs where at least one processor can run Linux. It's quite
reasonable to expect that many SoCs will have a main core that has Linux
capabilities
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:lng-odp-
boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of ext Jacob, Jerin
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 10:49 AM
To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [lng-odp] ODP Bare-metal support
All,
We have tried to add ODP
Signed-off-by: Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org
---
platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am
b/platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am
index 949b8d1..25c82ea 100644
--- a/platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am
+++
Signed-off-by: Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org
---
example/packet_netmap/odp_pktio_netmap.c | 2 +-
platform/linux-generic/include/odp_packet_netmap.h | 2 +-
platform/linux-generic/odp_packet_netmap.c | 8
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff
The structure in ODP has changed since last time netmap was checked.
This patch series fixes compilation issues for the netmap support
Ciprian Barbu (2):
linux-generic: odp_packet_netmap: Added missing source file in
Makefile.am
linux-generic: netmap: fixed renamed helper functions
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:31:40AM +, Savolainen, Petri (NSN - FI/Espoo)
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org [mailto:lng-odp-
boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of ext Jacob, Jerin
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2014 10:49 AM
To:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:14:20PM +0400, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
Hello Jacob,
that is interesting. Sound linke not huge work is needed. But in your case
you need to implement
separate odp platform which will use Cavium specific things instead of
linux-generic.
I also have some notes bellow.
If you use shared data (e.g. using global variables) in a multithreaded
environment, you will need to do explicit synchronization (barriers etc)
from the application.
I assume that the current test and example apps support multithreaded
(including multicore) environments. Do you think there are
oh...that would be bad. :-) I will mail you my books from the class.
--
Sincerely,
Marshall Guillory
Technical Program Enabler, Scrum master
Linaro Networking Group (LNG)
Engineering Group
M: +1.405.609.4491 IRC: marshallg Skype: hingedthinker
E: marshall.guill...@linaro.org
Linaro.org │
Signed-off-by: Petri Savolainen petri.savolai...@linaro.org
---
example/timer/odp_timer_test.c | 15 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/example/timer/odp_timer_test.c b/example/timer/odp_timer_test.c
index 4168856..d040821 100644
---
Implement odp implementation for linux-generic using standard
odp queue API.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov maxim.uva...@linaro.org
---
v4: - fixed Anderses comments. (did not use unlikely() for
init functions. Only for packet processing.
- checkpatch cleanup;
- update to the
Perti, can you please take a look at linux-generic: odp ipc
implementation v4 patch?
We need to define how to pass flags to odp_shm_reserve. Or we use mine
variant or yours.
Thank you,
Maxim.
On 09/03/2014 03:56 PM, Savolainen, Petri (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
-Original Message-
It depends on the bare metal environment. Depending on the underlying
architecture, the processing elements may have their own separate RAMs,
with controlled access to common areas. This maps better to a process
model with select shared memory areas than a threading model where there's
implied
On 09/02/2014 08:59 PM, Ciprian Barbu wrote:
Hello Taras,
I have updated my openvswitch_odp to the latest ODP version and I
would like some help testing it on keystone.
I haven't compiled ODP for KS2 yet, so maybe you can help me with that.
Let's make a HO. Are you available today?
The
Signed-off-by: Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org
---
Makefile | 12 +
openvswitch/Makefile | 41 +
.../0001-ofpbuf-Added-OFPBUF_ODP-type.patch| 60 +
...0002-Config-options-for-building-with-ODP.patch |
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Taras Kondratiuk
taras.kondrat...@linaro.org wrote:
On 09/02/2014 08:59 PM, Ciprian Barbu wrote:
Hello Taras,
I have updated my openvswitch_odp to the latest ODP version and I
would like some help testing it on keystone.
I haven't compiled ODP for KS2 yet,
Do you mean https://cards.linaro.org/browse/LNG-483 that was scheduled
behind OVS work ?
On 3 September 2014 13:06, Taras Kondratiuk taras.kondrat...@linaro.org
wrote:
On 09/03/2014 02:41 PM, Ciprian Barbu wrote:
The structure in ODP has changed since last time netmap was checked.
This
On 09/03/2014 08:18 PM, Mike Holmes wrote:
Do you mean https://cards.linaro.org/browse/LNG-483 that was scheduled
behind OVS work ?
Exactly this one.
___
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
Anders has requested that I put a bugID in my patches
for IPsec example application where I have a #define
to work around the fact this patch isn't in yet. Does
such a bugID already exist, or is there a chance this patch
will be accepted soon?
I would really like to get the IPsec app patches in
Taras, do you have a bug ID for the IPSEC_POLL_QUEUES workaround?
Anders has requested that be included in my IPsec application patch.
-Original Message-
From: Taras Kondratiuk [mailto:taras.kondrat...@linaro.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 10:42 AM
To: Robbie King (robking);
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=616
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=617
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=608
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613
Mike Holmes mike.hol...@linaro.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Are there any instructions on how to build with netmap ?
On 3 September 2014 07:41, Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Ciprian Barbu ciprian.ba...@linaro.org
---
platform/linux-generic/Makefile.am | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git
31 matches
Mail list logo
