Re: [lng-odp] odp timer unit test case question

On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:25:12AM +0200, Ola Liljedahl wrote: > On 19 May 2015 at 15:34, Jacob, Jerin wrote: > > Ola, > > > > Is there any specific reason for following check in timer validation test ? > pa > > > > diff --git a/test/validation/odp_timer.c b/test/validation/odp_timer.c > > index

Re: [lng-odp] odp timer unit test case question

On 19 May 2015 at 15:34, Jacob, Jerin wrote: > Ola, > > Is there any specific reason for following check in timer validation test ? pa > > diff --git a/test/validation/odp_timer.c b/test/validation/odp_timer.c > index 554b353..724026e 100644 > --- a/test/validation/odp_timer.c > +++ b/test/valida

Re: [lng-odp] [RFC] Add ipc.h

On 19 May 2015 at 19:04, Benoît Ganne wrote: > Hi Ola, > > Thanks for sharing this. We are also looking at IPC at Kalray, where our ODP > model is multi-process, shared-nothing, architecture. > From our point of view, the main requirements for IPC would be: > - use it to communicate between diffe

Re: [lng-odp] [RFC] Add ipc.h

Hi Ola, Thanks for sharing this. We are also looking at IPC at Kalray, where our ODP model is multi-process, shared-nothing, architecture. From our point of view, the main requirements for IPC would be: - use it to communicate between different address spaces (AS), and as such our messages sh

Re: [lng-odp] [RFC] Add ipc.h

On 19 May 2015 at 16:19, Ciprian Barbu wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Ola Liljedahl > wrote: >> As promised, here is my first attempt at a standalone API for IPC - inter >> process communication in a shared nothing architecture (message passing >> between processes which do not share

Re: [lng-odp] UberConference Reminder

Hi all, Your conference is about to begin! Weekly ODP Design Discussion Call May 19, 2015 at 8:00AM MST Just to be sure, the conference is canceled this week, right? Thanks, ben ___ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro

[lng-odp] UberConference Reminder

UberConference Reminder___ lng-odp mailing list lng-odp@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv2 2/2] validation: init tests using common main

On 2015-05-07 18:09, Mike Holmes wrote: > On 5 May 2015 at 12:31, Christophe Milard > wrote: > > > This is the one I'd like to be reviewed... (v2) sorry for the confusion. > > > > On 27 April 2015 at 17:54, Christophe Milard > > wrote: > > > >> The 3 init tests (init, abort,log) now links wi

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCHv5 0/4] IPC

It seems like there is still a discussion floating on patch 2, about including helper code in the linux-generic implementation. I will have a look at the other patches, but I think you need to solve the issue with the ring code before marking the patchset as ready to be merged. On Mon, May 18, 201

Re: [lng-odp] [RFC] Add ipc.h

On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:03 AM, Ola Liljedahl wrote: > As promised, here is my first attempt at a standalone API for IPC - inter > process communication in a shared nothing architecture (message passing > between processes which do not share memory). > > Currently all definitions are in the file

[lng-odp] odp timer unit test case question

Ola, Is there any specific reason for following check in timer validation test ? diff --git a/test/validation/odp_timer.c b/test/validation/odp_timer.c index 554b353..724026e 100644 --- a/test/validation/odp_timer.c +++ b/test/validation/odp_timer.c @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void handle_tmo(odp_

Re: [lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: packet: use PRIu32 instead of %d

Actually those printf() calls are vestigial from debugging and should be removed. They were not intended to be part of the final tests. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin < nmo...@kalray.eu> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin > --- > Note: the new checkp

[lng-odp] [PATCHv2] helpers: fix udp checksum computation

From: Alexandru Badicioiu Signed-off-by: Alexandru Badicioiu Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov --- v2: fix csum in odp generatior. example/generator/odp_generator.c | 2 +- helper/include/odp/helper/udp.h | 37 + 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletio

[lng-odp] [Bug 1449] odp_timer_test core dump

https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1449 --- Comment #5 from Ola Liljedahl --- I am testing with periods 1x-2x the length of the timer resolution and still get intermittent too early failures. I assume this is caused by the non-determinism of Linux, the ODP threads may not execute immediately

[lng-odp] [Bug 1449] odp_timer_test core dump

https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1449 --- Comment #4 from Ola Liljedahl --- I see now that the reason for the abort and core dump is that the timeout period is smaller than the tick (the resolution of the timer). This does not make sense and is also not supported by the timer example which

Re: [lng-odp] [Bug 1449] New: odp_timer_test core dump

On 19 May 2015 at 11:43, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: > I ran into the same issue on our side and after a quick look, this is > kind of expected. > By setting a period to a time duration smaller than the resolution, the > probability is very high that this would happen > Yes period should n

Re: [lng-odp] [Bug 1449] New: odp_timer_test core dump

I ran into the same issue on our side and after a quick look, this is kind of expected. By setting a period to a time duration smaller than the resolution, the probability is very high that this would happen Example: Get tick => N Time out = Tick + Period = N + 0 = N == New tick == set_abs_timeo

Re: [lng-odp] [RFC] Add ipc.h

On 19 May 2015 at 03:53, Bill Fischofer wrote: > See comments inline. In general I like this, as it does seem clean and > minimal. > > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Ola Liljedahl > wrote: > >> As promised, here is my first attempt at a standalone API for IPC - inter >> process communication

[lng-odp] [PATCH 1/2 v1] examples: ipsec: tunnel mode support

From: Alexandru Badicioiu v1 - added comment for tunnel DB entry use Tunnel mode is enabled from the command line using -t argument with the following format: SrcIP:DstIP:TunnelSrcIP:TunnelDstIP. SrcIP - cleartext packet source IP DstIP - cleartext packet destination IP TunnelSrcIP - tunnel sour

[lng-odp] [PATCH] validation: packet: use PRIu32 instead of %d

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin --- Note: the new checkpatch does not seem to be happy with PRIu32 put this way (CamelCase and no space in concatenated strings) but I kept it homogeneous with the other printfs test/validation/odp_packet.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 d

[lng-odp] [PATCH] platform: Makefile.inc: use `` instead of != for compatibility with older versions of Make

Suggested-by: Maxim Uvarov Signed-off-by: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin --- platform/Makefile.inc | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/platform/Makefile.inc b/platform/Makefile.inc index f232daa..f64e37c 100644 --- a/platform/Makefile.inc +++ b/platform/Makefile.inc @

Re: [lng-odp] How to run ODP on Fedora?

On 05/19/2015 00:30, Ola Liljedahl wrote: On 18 May 2015 at 20:36, Li, Charlie > wrote: Hi Maxim, I have tried linux-generic and odp_l2fwd worked. But when I tried netmap (https://git.linaro.org/lng/odp-netmap.git), I got the following compuler er