Regards,
Stanisław Kardach
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> > Stanislaw Kardach
externally visible pools).
--
Best Regards,
Stanisław Kardach
; call or is it more
"proper" in ODP terms to have a primary process call odp_init_global() and
pass the odp_instance_t with some IPC to "secondary" processes which will
only call odp_init_local()?
--
Best Regards,
Stanisław Kardach
Although beware of using the Debian/ Ubuntu package. They are Very outdated
and it's better to just compile from source.
On Jan 13, 2017 5:11 PM, "Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin"
wrote:
> It's called "pahole".
> Should come with dwarves packages on most standard disto.
>
> Nicolas
That was my mail software messing around with tabs in the patch. Will
re-send again.
--
Best Regards,
Stanisław Kardach
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Christophe Milard <
christophe.mil...@linaro.org> wrote:
> This seems a good correction. However I get the following when
&
As per API documentation, odp_term_global() should be a final ODP call
when terminating the ODP application in a controlled way. Therefore ODP
threads or sub-processes created using ODP helper API should not call
this function but leave it to the main application thread/process.
Signed-off-by: