Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/2] api: pktio link

2015-10-09 Thread Maxim Uvarov
On 10/08/15 15:26, Ola Liljedahl wrote: On 17 September 2015 at 18:03, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin > wrote: Polling the link status makes sense but isn't setting the link state a bit redundant with pktio start/stop ? On meeting we figured out

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/2] api: pktio link

2015-10-08 Thread Ola Liljedahl
On 17 September 2015 at 18:03, Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin wrote: > Polling the link status makes sense but isn't setting the link state a bit > redundant with pktio start/stop ? > I also think that applications should not be able to (attempt to) control the link state. The link

[lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/2] api: pktio link

2015-09-17 Thread Maxim Uvarov
Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov --- include/odp/api/packet_io.h | 22 ++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/odp/api/packet_io.h b/include/odp/api/packet_io.h index 9b930bd..631aec2 100644 --- a/include/odp/api/packet_io.h +++

Re: [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH 1/2] api: pktio link

2015-09-17 Thread Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin
Polling the link status makes sense but isn't setting the link state a bit redundant with pktio start/stop ? On 09/17/2015 03:56 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > Signed-off-by: Maxim Uvarov > --- > include/odp/api/packet_io.h | 22 ++ > 1 file changed, 22