Merged,
we also need this option to be tested in CI.
Maxim.
On 10/12/16 18:21, Bill Fischofer wrote:
This version resolves the issue with running from an installed copy of ODP.
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Petri Savolainen <
petri.savolai...@nokia.com> wrote:
Building ABI compatible or
Make check should skip the test instead of failing it.
Test splits RX and TX cores for packet processing. Core
0 bind to control thread. So running machine should have
at least 2 worker threads which is not enough on 1 and 2
cpus machine. CUnit uses special value 77 to mark test as
SKIPPED and not
On 13 October 2016 at 12:39, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> On 10/13/16 19:33, Mike Holmes wrote:
>
>> Anders comments have not been addressed on the list, are they resloved ?
>>
>>
> In current patch set - no. Because it's subject for separate patch. But we
> need resolve
On 10/13/16 19:33, Mike Holmes wrote:
Anders comments have not been addressed on the list, are they resloved ?
In current patch set - no. Because it's subject for separate patch. But
we need resolve version name before tagging.
Maxim.
On 13 October 2016 at 11:40, Maxim Uvarov
Anders comments have not been addressed on the list, are they resloved ?
On 13 October 2016 at 11:40, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Merged,
>
> we also need this option to be tested in CI.
>
> Maxim.
>
>
> On 10/12/16 18:21, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>> This version resolves the
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2552
Bug ID: 2552
Summary: Timer pools expire one tick later than they should
Product: OpenDataPlane - linux- generic reference
Version: v1.11.0.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Since this is a bug fix, please open a Bug for it so that this can be
tracked as a defect closure.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Brian Brooks
wrote:
> A timer pool's tick starts at t0 (zero). Once the first period has passed,
> the timer pool is scanned for any
On 13 October 2016 at 12:37, Maxim Uvarov wrote:
> Make check should skip the test instead of failing it.
> Test splits RX and TX cores for packet processing. Core
> 0 bind to control thread. So running machine should have
> at least 2 worker threads which is not enough
Ping. I'd like to get some review feedback on this patch series so we can
make progress on this item. I believe this reflects the basics of what we
discussed at LAS16. But if the APIs need to be adjusted then what sort of
adjustment is needed?
Thanks.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Bill
On 13 October 2016 at 02:44, Bill Fischofer wrote:
> Add the odp_dev_id() API used for NUMA support
>
I am a bit confused here: what is a device? a numa_id or other things
as well? In this patch series everything that relates to numa is
called "device". Shouldn't be
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Christophe Milard <
christophe.mil...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 13:20, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Christophe Milard
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13
On 13 October 2016 at 13:20, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Christophe Milard
> wrote:
>>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 02:44, Bill Fischofer
>> wrote:
>> > Add the odp_dev_id() API used
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Christophe Milard <
christophe.mil...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 02:44, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
> > Add the odp_dev_id() API used for NUMA support
> >
>
> I am a bit confused here: what is a device? a numa_id or other
Guys,
I was going to implement checksum offload for OFP project based on
Monarch checksum offload capability and I found out that there is no
example for using that API. Also, documentation seams to leave some room
for various interpretations, so I would like to clarify that and post a
Hi,
I am working for ODP (OpenDataPlane: http://opendataplane.org) and we
are using autotools (including libtool)
We want to have connectable plug-ins to implements some functions
(actually user-space NIC drivers). These plug-ins would be either
linked dynamicaly (using dlopen()) or staticaly, at
On 13 October 2016 at 14:06, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Christophe Milard
> wrote:
>>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 13:44, Bill Fischofer
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 13,
On 13 October 2016 at 13:44, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Christophe Milard
> wrote:
>>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 13:20, Bill Fischofer
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 13,
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Christophe Milard <
christophe.mil...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 13:44, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Christophe Milard
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13
18 matches
Mail list logo