This patch (API changes):
Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen
> -Original Message-
> From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org] On Behalf Of
> Matias Elo
> Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 11:49 AM
> To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
> Subject: Suspected SPAM - [lng-odp] [API-NEXT PATCH
Merged,
Maxim.
On 10/14/16 18:03, Mike Holmes wrote:
On 22 September 2016 at 15:04, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
Add the missing internal doxygen documentation for the ticketlock_inlines
functions used to accelerate odp-linux even when building with
--enable-abi-compat=yes
Signed-off-by: Bill Fisch
Merged.
On 10/14/16 14:45, Mike Holmes wrote:
also need to put
Fixes https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2552
I put this link to git log.
Maxim.
Into the patch description, maybe that can happen as it is pushed ?
On 13 October 2016 at 17:46, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
Since this is a bug
On 10 October 2016 at 17:50, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
> This patch adds support for packet references and splices following
> discussions at LAS16 on this subject.
>
> I've changed things around from Petri's original proposal by splitting this
> into two separate APIs: odp_packet_splice() and odp_pa
On 10/13/16 03:44, Bill Fischofer wrote:
+
+#ifndef ODP_API_DEV_H_
+#define ODP_API_DEV_H_
+#include
+
+#ifdef __cplusplus
+extern "C" {
+#endif
+
+#include
+
+/** @defgroup odp_dev ODP DEVICE
+ * Operations on devices
+ * @{
+ */
+
+/**
+ * @typedef odp_dev_t
+ * ODP Device
+ */
+
+/**
+ * @
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> On 10/13/16 03:44, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>> +
>> +#ifndef ODP_API_DEV_H_
>> +#define ODP_API_DEV_H_
>> +#include
>> +
>> +#ifdef __cplusplus
>> +extern "C" {
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +#include
>> +
>> +/** @defgroup odp_dev ODP DEVICE
>> + * O
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Ola Liljedahl
wrote:
> On 10 October 2016 at 17:50, Bill Fischofer
> wrote:
>
>> This patch adds support for packet references and splices following
>> discussions at LAS16 on this subject.
>>
>> I've changed things around from Petri's original proposal by splitt
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Maxim Uvarov
wrote:
> by 'some' I mean mask of numa nodes:
>
> odp_numa_mask_t mask;
>
> odp_pool_create(.., param.mask = 0x5);
>
> where 0x5 will say that numa node 0 and numa node 2 available for
> allocation, but not numa node 1.
>
Given that an odp_dev_t is
