Merged.
On 10/14/16 14:45, Mike Holmes wrote:
also need to put
Fixes https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2552
I put this link to git log.
Maxim.
Into the patch description, maybe that can happen as it is pushed ?
On 13 October 2016 at 17:46, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
Since this is a bug
also need to put
Fixes https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2552
Into the patch description, maybe that can happen as it is pushed ?
On 13 October 2016 at 17:46, Bill Fischofer
wrote:
> Since this is a bug fix, please open a Bug for it so that this can be
> tracked as a defect closure.
>
> O
Since this is a bug fix, please open a Bug for it so that this can be
tracked as a defect closure.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Brian Brooks
wrote:
> A timer pool's tick starts at t0 (zero). Once the first period has passed,
> the timer pool is scanned for any timers that have expired since
A timer pool's tick starts at t0 (zero). Once the first period has passed,
the timer pool is scanned for any timers that have expired since t0 + 1.
Current code does an atomic fetch increment on the tick, but uses the
previous tick during timer expiration processing. What is needed is the
previous
