Christopher Smith wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 05:10, Christophe de Vienne wrote:
The NDC constructor/desctructor already implement RAII. One can write :
Now I feel silly. :-(
Don't, I did the exact same thing a few month ago :-)
Hmmm... It looks like the NDC constructor (and destructor
On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 05:10, Christophe de Vienne wrote:
> The NDC constructor/desctructor already implement RAII. One can write :
Now I feel silly. :-(
Hmmm... It looks like the NDC constructor (and destructor for that
matter) aren't documented. Looks like that psyched me out.
--Chris
Christopher Smith wrote:
So, I just started playing with log4cxx today. I've used log4cpp in
the past, but it appears to have stagnated, so I thought I'd make a
change.
Anyway, one of the first things I noticed was that NDC's don't have a
natural way to follow the RAII paradigm to ensure they g
So, I just started playing with log4cxx today. I've used log4cpp in the
past, but it appears to have stagnated, so I thought I'd make a change.
Anyway, one of the first things I noticed was that NDC's don't have a
natural way to follow the RAII paradigm to ensure they get cleaned up. I
made a s