Guten Tag Wiebesiek, Torsten,
am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2016 um 14:29 schrieben Sie:
> I just want to tell, that am willing to prepare a log4cxx release.
Sounds good, I just removed the 3 open issues currently assigned to
0.11.0, because if they are not fixed now, they won't be in the short
time an
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Wiebesiek, Torsten <
torsten.wiebes...@grecon.de> wrote:
> > > If not you, then ...? Are there other committers who are interesting
> > > in taking the release mantle, and really give yourself breathing room
> > > to just improve the code without all the rest of t
> > If not you, then ...? Are there other committers who are interesting
> > in taking the release mantle, and really give yourself breathing room
> > to just improve the code without all the rest of the details?
>
> Torsten Wiebesiek seemed interested to read the details about the
> release pro
Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
am Samstag, 9. Januar 2016 um 18:26 schrieben Sie:
> While we are waiting to find out who is interested in the heavy
> lifting of creating a release candidate, who here is willing to
> review such candidates and cast a +/-1 vote for release of the
> package?
Which of
Assuming the release can be compiled on fedora, I can review and vote on it
(as an IPMC member).
John
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 12:26 PM William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
>
> On Jan 9, 2016 02:53, "Thorsten Schöning" wrote:
> >
> > Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
> > am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 23:54 schri
On Jan 9, 2016 02:53, "Thorsten Schöning" wrote:
>
> Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
> am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 23:54 schrieben Sie:
>
> > If not you, then ...? Are there other committers who are interesting
in taking
> > the release mantle, and really give yourself breathing room to just
impro
Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 23:54 schrieben Sie:
> If not you, then ...? Are there other committers who are interesting in
> taking
> the release mantle, and really give yourself breathing room to just improve
> the code without all the rest of the details?
Torste
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Thorsten Schöning
wrote:
> Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
> am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 19:18 schrieben Sie:
>
> > I'm trying to understand whether we are looking at a cultural refusal to
> > ever put a post in the stand and say "this is a release, there will be
>
Have no fear, we can extract all history from the svn repo. I don't know
what approach you used, such that your IP was auto-banned, but that can be
solved. We've done this before.
So: please don't worry about that, within this discussion.
On Jan 8, 2016 1:11 PM, "Thorsten Schöning" wrote:
> Gute
Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 19:18 schrieben Sie:
> I'm trying to understand whether we are looking at a cultural refusal to
> ever put a post in the stand and say "this is a release, there will be other
> releases, but this is our release as of now"? Or is this simp
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Thorsten Schöning
wrote:
> Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
> am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 15:33 schrieben Sie:
>
> > Forty forks means 40 prospective committers.
>
> Or just people, like some of those currently involved, which change
> things once in a while because
Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr,
am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 15:33 schrieben Sie:
> Forty forks means 40 prospective committers.
Or just people, like some of those currently involved, which change
things once in a while because of bugs or such. I'm always just happy
if my fixes are simply merged wi
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:31 AM, wrote:
> As a user (and small time contributor once) of log4cxx, I would vote for a
> move to a central hosting on github. I don't mind what happens to the
> project in terms of the apache organization as I use log4cxx as a
> stand-alone library - and I guess many
Hi,
> I am not familiar with the Apache requirements for a project. From
> what I understand, there have to be reports filed every three month.
> What else? How can we proceed with the limited resources, we have?
> The reports every 3 months shouldn't be a big problem, but you need
> to do e.g.
Guten Tag Wiebesiek, Torsten,
am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 11:16 schrieben Sie:
> I am not familiar with the Apache requirements for a project. From
> what I understand, there have to be reports filed every three month.
> What else? How can we proceed with the limited resources, we have?
The rep
As a user (and small time contributor once) of log4cxx, I would vote for a move
to a central hosting on github. I don't mind what happens to the project in
terms of the apache organization as I use log4cxx as a stand-alone library -
and I guess many others use log4cxx in the same fashion. Howeve
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> So even if we are to dead for the incubator, we are to alive for the
> attic.
If you can't make a release, you're dead enough for the Attic.
Marvin Humphrey
> Or clone/fork it into Trafodion, if you need updates or continued
maintenance.
Any chance apr-util could pick up the torch? That would at least centralize
it as anyone needing log4cxx needs apr-util.
- Rhys
Or clone/fork it into Trafodion, if you need updates or continued
maintenance. Look at it as just another component (rather than a separate
project).
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Thorsten Schöning
wrote:
> Guten Tag Roberta Marton,
> am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016 um 17:14 schrieben Sie:
>
>
> It doesn't look like there's other members still around
I'm still lurking but have not touched the code for awhile.
It is, and has been, unclear what needs to happen for a 0.11.0 release
candidate [1]. Much of the problem is that there's no concensus on what
build system should work. Autoto
Guten Tag Marvin Humphrey,
am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016 um 04:59 schrieben Sie:
> The community has one active developer as far as I can tell, and at least he
> is responding to user inquiries when they come in. But one developer does not
> make an Apache community.
Looking at the SVN history,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 5:37 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I happened to stumble upon the log4cxx mailing list where there is concern
> over mentor participation. It appears that they may need help, more mentor
> participation to help get reports through.
>
> They're a small podling, so I
22 matches
Mail list logo
