Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread Ralph Goers
I should follow this up. My understanding is that the goal of this project in the incubator is to have at least 3 active committers who can demonstrate their ability to perform releases. Once that is accomplished those committers should be able to become Logging PMC members and the project can

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mar 1, 2016 6:36 PM, "Ralph Goers" wrote: > > >> On Mar 1, 2016, at 1:13 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> The fact that the logging PMC had no interest in including its contributors was a shame, let's work to avoid such mistakes in the future, and build an effective ppmc. > > > I don’t under

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 1:13 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > The fact that the logging PMC had no interest in including its contributors > was a shame, let's work to avoid such mistakes in the future, and build an > effective ppmc. > I don’t understand this statement. What contributors are you s

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mar 1, 2016 12:43, "Thorsten Schöning" wrote: > > Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr, > am Dienstag, 1. März 2016 um 18:28 schrieben Sie: > > > If there are three+ active project members volunteering to review and > > cast up/down votes on release candidates[...] > > I'm willing to vote, but reviewing

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread Ralph Goers
Bill, This project was originally a subproject of logging. The PMC was made aware that there were people who were actively interested in “rebooting” the project. We were not comfortable adding those people to the logging PMC and suggested that it would be better to move the project to the inc

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag William A Rowe Jr, am Dienstag, 1. März 2016 um 18:28 schrieben Sie: > If there are three+ active project members volunteering to review and > cast up/down votes on release candidates[...] I'm willing to vote, but reviewing is a more interesting part, because I mainly use a custom Windo

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Marvin Humphrey, am Dienstag, 1. März 2016 um 18:19 schrieben Sie: > A report that states "no change since last month" is not a great > report, but it is better than copying-and-pasting.[...] Thanks for the hints, I always thought it's exactly the other way around because that way peopl

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > > A report that states "no change since last month" is not a great > report, but it is better than copying-and-pasting. But in fact there > are interesting things to say about log4cxx's development the last > month: it would help the IMPC

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-03-01 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > Guten Tag Marvin Humphrey, > am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 um 20:14 schrieben Sie: > >> This is a reminder that your report is due next Wednesday, March >> 2nd. > > I've added the same like last month, I don't see that things have > ch

Re: March 2016 Report

2016-02-25 Thread Thorsten Schöning
Guten Tag Marvin Humphrey, am Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 um 20:14 schrieben Sie: > This is a reminder that your report is due next Wednesday, March > 2nd. I've added the same like last month, I don't see that things have changed. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2016 Mit freundlichen Gr