Re: log4cxx-0.10.0: Fix for 64 bit-only thread safety bug in ObjectPtrBase

2010-07-14 Thread Jade2k
deepak singh-4 wrote: > > Use apr, apr-util, expat, log4cxx libraries compiled with -fPIC flag. > It works in my case. >> I'l try to fire up a copy of CentOS 5 x64 this weekend. >> >> Did it occur during the unit tests or one of the sample applications, or >> in >> some other context? >> > I

Re: log4cxx-0.10.0: Fix for 64 bit-only thread safety bug in ObjectPtrBase

2010-07-14 Thread Jade2k
Let me retract that message above the patch and with the option, did not fix it. First time running the application, it did this: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'log4cxx::helpers::MutexException' what(): Mutex exception: stat = 22 Aborted Then rerunning it again with th

Re: log4cxx-0.10.0: Fix for 64 bit-only thread safety bug in ObjectPtrBase

2010-07-14 Thread Jade2k
BTW here is also the stack when one of the exceptions mentioned above is thrown: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'log4cxx::helpers::MutexException' what(): Mutex exception: stat = 1 Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread 0x41401940 (LWP 18319)] 0x003

Re: log4cxx-0.10.0: Fix for 64 bit-only thread safety bug in ObjectPtrBase

2010-07-16 Thread Jade2k
Curt Arnold-3 wrote: > > Any specific instructions on reproducing the problem would be appreciated. > Especially along the lines of > > 1. fire up this AMI on Amazon Web Services > 2. Do this and that > 3. Crash > > Setting up non-default development platforms is a chore and having a > repro

Re: log4cxx-0.10.0: Fix for 64 bit-only thread safety bug in ObjectPtrBase

2010-07-20 Thread Jade2k
Hi Curt, I was reading your http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/log4cxx-u...@logging.apache.org/4931122.html post here and I think I understand what I might have done wrong to make it non-threadsafe (I too had made my logstream a data member). So here's the modification of my code (though it