Offer to mentor

I just subscribed to the dev list and haven’t coded in C++ in a very long time, but I am willing to act as a mentor for the project and help out where I can, although most of my time is spent on Log4j. Ralph

Re: March 2016 Report

Bill, This project was originally a subproject of logging. The PMC was made aware that there were people who were actively interested in “rebooting” the project. We were not comfortable adding those people to the logging PMC and suggested that it would be better to move the project to the inc

Re: March 2016 Report

> On Mar 1, 2016, at 1:13 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > The fact that the logging PMC had no interest in including its contributors > was a shame, let's work to avoid such mistakes in the future, and build an > effective ppmc. > I don’t understand this statement. What contributors are you s

Re: March 2016 Report

move back. I don’t really see anything in the report that gives an indication of how close or far away we are and looking at the dev mailing list I am not sure either. Ralph > On Mar 1, 2016, at 5:46 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2016 6:36 PM, "Ralph Goers"

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2016

I just read the report. The ASF has no “maintenance mode” status, so that isn’t really an option. That said, Log4PHP is basically in the same state. It remains active in the logging project because there are people there who say they will actively maintain it even though nothing ever happens.

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2016

I have signed off on the report with comments. Ralph > On May 27, 2016, at 6:13 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I just read the report. The ASF has no “maintenance mode” status, so that > isn’t really an option. That said, Log4PHP is basically in the same state. > It remain

Re: Release Procedure

If you abandon using Maven that is fine, but if you need some help I’d be happy to look at it when I can. Curt probably used a Maven 2.x release as 3.x is pretty recent. You might try using the latest of that and see where it takes you. Ralph > On Aug 7, 2016, at 6:38 PM, Robert Middleton wro

Project status

The Logging PMC has been discussing merging all the mailing lists into a single dev list and a single user’s list. As such, this is probably a good time to discuss where log4cxx is headed. It seems to me the experiment that to reboot log4cxx has not succeeded. As such I think the proper course

Re: Project status

mirrored to github. Yes, Jira could be used. The project wouldn’t close down. It would just be dormant until someone decides they want to do some work. Ralph > On Mar 1, 2017, at 10:44 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > > Guten Tag Ralph Goers, > am Mittwoch, 1. März 2017 um 18:01 s

Re: [VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

+1 Note that generally a -1 is a veto only on code commits. On everything else it just means you are against the proposal. However, we generally strive for consensus so great weight is given to binding votes that are opposed. Ralph > On Mar 7, 2017, at 9:23 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > This is

[Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

g4j-dev@, log4php-dev@, log4net-dev@, log4cxx-dev@ -> > d...@logging.apache.org <mailto:d...@logging.apache.org> > Matt Sicker: +1 > Ralph Goers: +1 > Stefan Bodewig: +1 > Sven Rautenverg: -1 > Thorsten Schöning: -0 > Ivan Habunek: -0 > Dominik Psenner: +1 > Re

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

t doesn't cause any > issues currently. The main idea here is whether we should merge the dev lists > into one, or if we need a common dev list for all devs to subscribe to > (general@ doesn't sound appropriate, but I don't know what that list is for). > >

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

ll > of them need a larger audience. Just quoting the last few messages of two > user mailing lists I follow: > > log4j-user: the last topic came in a week ago, the topic before that about > two weeks ago > log4net-user: the last topic came in 24 hours ago and the topic before that a

Moving the project from the incubator to Logging Services

The Logging Services PMC has voted to move Log4cxx out of the incubator back into Logging Services. I will start a vote on the Incubator general list to accomplish this. After the vote completes we can discuss whether the code should stay in subversion of move to git. Ralph

Re: Moving the project from the incubator to Logging Services

I will on the vote thread in incubator but only ASF members will be able to read it as it is on the private list. Ralph > On Mar 11, 2017, at 10:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Can you share a link to the vote? > > > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:04 PM Ralph Go

Re: Moving the project from the incubator to Logging Services

27;re aware of the goal. I > didn't see a community graduation vote from the podling. > > John > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:18 PM Ralph Goers <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: > I will on the vote thread in incubator but only ASF members will be able

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

er lists as > is. Shall we move forward with combining them now? > > On 10 March 2017 at 12:27, Dominik Psenner <mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Total agreement. > > On 10 Mar 2017 6:26 p.m., "Ralph Goers" <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wr

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

to:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Created a request, not sure if it's public: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-13651 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-13651> > > On 12 March 2017 at 17:11, Ralph

[RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

This vote has been open for more than 5 days. It received 5 +1 votes and no other votes. So we will begin the process of moving the project back to Logging Services. Ralph > On Mar 11, 2017, at 10:31 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Log4cxx was originally a sub-project of the Logging Ser

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Is there any follow-up to this? Ralph > On Mar 12, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > 1. That seems fine to me. > 2. Is it possible to do both? I like the idea of annoying the sender but > still allowing the email to be sent. It would cool if it could even add > [

Re: Project status

Now that the incubator vote has passed we can formally begin the process of moving the project back to Logging Services. Frankly, there isn’t much to do. This list is going to be merged into d...@logging.apache.org along with all the other sub-projects while th

Re: Project status

e been working on doing the same > thing with some Apache Commons repos lately. > > On 17 March 2017 at 04:00, Thorsten Schöning <mailto:tschoen...@am-soft.de>> wrote: > Guten Tag Ralph Goers, > am Freitag, 17. März 2017 um 03:56 schrieben Sie: > > > My personal

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

> On 16 March 2017 at 22:23, Matt Sicker <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Oh, I didn't realise I had a response on how to handle that. Let me follow up > with infra. > > On 16 March 2017 at 21:46, Ralph Goers <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>>

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Thanks Matt! Ralph > On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > > No other opinions apparently. I suppose we'll go with the single list with > bounce messages. I'll follow up with infra later today. > > On 18 March 2017 at 13:12, Ralph Goers <ma

Re: [Discuss][VOTE] Combine the project user and dev mailing lists into user@ and dev@

Matt, Any update on this? Ralph > On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:27 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > Thanks Matt! > > Ralph > >> On Mar 21, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Matt Sicker > <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> No other opinions apparently. I suppo

Fwd: Slack Invites

I have created a logging channel on Slack for anyone who wants to use it. Ralph > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "John D. Ament" > Subject: Slack Invites > Date: March 29, 2017 at 6:54:53 AM MST > To: "gene...@incubator.apache.org" > Reply-To: gene...@incubator.apache.org > > All, > > B

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

gt; > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:45 PM Ralph Goers <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: > This vote has been open for more than 5 days. It received 5 +1 votes and no > other votes. So we will begin the process of moving the project back to > Logging Services. >

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Ralph > On Apr 5, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > No. To be honest, I’m not 100% sure if the community wants to move to git or > not and I am not quite sure what the process is to move from svn to git > without losing history. I guess I will just create a Jira issue

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13831 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13831> for the move from svn to git. Ralph > On Apr 5, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > I figured out how to see the issue - > https://issues.apache.org/jira/

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

> On Apr 6, 2017, at 2:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > > Guten Tag Ralph Goers, > am Donnerstag, 6. April 2017 um 07:10 schrieben Sie: > >> No. To be honest, I’m not 100% sure if the community wants to move >> to git or not > > "We" want, as

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

Thanks for the info Greg! Ralph > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 4:04 AM, Thorsten Schöning > wrote: > >... > > and I am not quite sure what the process is to move > > from svn to git without losing history. I guess I wil

Re: New git repository created: logging-log4cxx.git

I used svn2git. It uses git svn under the covers. I had to create an authors file. I just used everyone’s apache.org email account as I don’t know of a good way to determine the real account. I can say that is a process I don’t look forward to doing again. It took about 6 h

Log4jcxx web site

The log4cxx web site needs to be update to: A) point to the git repos instead of svn B) remove the incubator logo and perhaps replace it with a project specific logo. C) replace the disclaimer on the main page regarding being an incubator project. D) Change the mailing list page to direct to d...@

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

s. > > John > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 1:10 AM Ralph Goers <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: > Thanks for the info Greg! > > Ralph > > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Greg Stein > <mailto:gst...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >

Re: Log4jcxx web site

Thorsten Schöning wrote: > > Guten Tag Ralph Goers, > am Sonntag, 9. April 2017 um 21:15 schrieben Sie: > >> The log4cxx web site needs to be update to: > > Applied all changes. Regarding the dev-mailing list, I simply guessed > that it will follow the old naming

Re: Log4jcxx web site

> On 10 April 2017 at 20:11, Matt Sicker <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Yikes, we need to apply the alternate theme to that site! Default Maven site > theme looks like it was designed 20 years ago. > > On 10 April 2017 at 20:07, Ralph Goers <mailto:ralph.go...@ds

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Return Log4cxx to the Logging Services project

I don’t really know the answer to that. Ralph > On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:35 AM, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > > Guten Tag Ralph Goers, > am Montag, 10. April 2017 um 01:12 schrieben Sie: > >> Yes, please go ahead. > > What happens to the former GIT mirror on GitHub?

Re: How to deactivate/delete old GitHub mirror for log4cxx?

Thorsten, I’d say it is up to you as to which way to go. In either case are you comfortable creating the infra ticket or would you like me to do it? Ralph > On Apr 11, 2017, at 3:42 AM, Pono Takamori wrote: > > We can either delete the old Github mirror or put up a link to the new > repo in th

[jira] [Commented] (LOGCXX-480) SVN should be migrated from incubator area

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15257387#comment-15257387 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOGCXX-480: Where did you get the idea that log4cxx

[jira] [Commented] (LOGCXX-480) SVN should be migrated from incubator area

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGCXX-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15257535#comment-15257535 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOGCXX-480: This issue should be closed as it was create