On Mar 19, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Jacob L. Anawalt wrote:
Curt Arnold wrote:
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Jacob L. Anawalt wrote:
again. If it hadn't been, I was thinking that the current online
API docs looked a little more efficient for simple strings (which
is where I currently use the l
Curt Arnold wrote:
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Jacob L. Anawalt wrote:
again. If it hadn't been, I was thinking that the current online API
docs looked a little more efficient for simple strings (which is where
I currently use the logging macros), and that I would re-implement the
older s
On Mar 18, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Jacob L. Anawalt wrote:
Stephen Bartnikowski wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Josh Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LOG4CXX_DEBUG(logger, "Read " << path << " and got " << out);
Nice. I hadn't tried that since 'message' was documented to expect a
st
> -Original Message-
> From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 10:42 AM
> To: Log4CXX User
> Subject: Re: Use of operator<<
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Stephen Bartnikowski wrote:
> >
> > Hi Josh
Stephen Bartnikowski wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Josh Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LOG4CXX_DEBUG(logger, "Read " << path << " and got " << out);
Nice. I hadn't tried that since 'message' was documented to expect a string and
I didn't know if it would break in future ver
On Mar 18, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Stephen Bartnikowski wrote:
Hi Josh,
As far as I can tell support was dropped for those macros, which
made me sad
too. But it's not too hard to cook up some macros of your own. I did
it like
this:
#define LOGGING_DEBUG(message) { \
if ((*pLogger)->isDebugE
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 9:10 AM
> To: log4cxx-user@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Use of operator<<
>
> I saw that I can use the << operator within the LOG4CXX_DEBUG, etc.
>
o use something like
boost::format for every log statement), but as far as I can tell, it's
undocumented. Is this use of operator<< officially supported, or is
it an implementation detail that I should not be relying upon?
If it is supported, then can I add a wiki page about it? If it&#x
