RE: Client-side footprint size for Log4j

2002-10-10 Thread Jason Dillon
> What do you mean by "for use on clients"? Applets? More comments at the > end... I meant thin-clients (applets, simple tools using dynamic proxies, etc.). > One question is whether the JVM will load unused classes in a jar file. > Assume a jar file is 1MB consisting of 1000 classes of which o

Re: Client-side footprint size for Log4j

2002-10-09 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 04:08 09.10.2002 -0700, you wrote: >Hi. I am a transient to this list and have a question about the client-side >footprint for Log4j. It used to be that Log4j was shipped with a -core.jar >(still kind of large) for use on clients, but that is not the case anymore. What do you mean by "for us

Client-side footprint size for Log4j

2002-10-09 Thread Jason Dillon
Hi. I am a transient to this list and have a question about the client-side footprint for Log4j. It used to be that Log4j was shipped with a -core.jar (still kind of large) for use on clients, but that is not the case anymore. I have been going back and forth for months (starting a while ago