> What a curious little problem! I suppose it makes some kind of sense
> that extensions placed in jre/lib/ext/ should be self
> contained. That's
> probably the intention.
JNDI for example is loaded by the bootstrap class loader for JDK 1.3 and it
has to load application classes. That is why i
What a curious little problem! I suppose it makes some kind of sense
that extensions placed in jre/lib/ext/ should be self contained. That's
probably the intention.
There is an issue with the solution you propose, anyway, which is that
the 3-arg version of Class.forName() was introduced in JDK 1
