ülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/04/2001 02:16:39 PM
>
>Please respond to "LOG4J Developers Mailing List"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>To: "LOG4J Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc:
>Subject: Re: Recent commit by Paul
>
ervices
818 539 3321
Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/04/2001 02:16:39 PM
Please respond to "LOG4J Developers Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LOG4J Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Recent commit by Paul
At 10:43 04.06.2001 -0700, you wrote:
>Ceki,
>
>The PropertyConfigurator only sets the default category factory when
>someone has specified that a different category factory be used (via the
>categoryFactory property). Without this behaviour, we are saying go ahead
>and specify any factory you
AIL PROTECTED]> on 06/04/2001 09:56:50 AM
Please respond to "LOG4J Developers Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LOG4J Developers Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: Recent commit by Paul
Hello Paul,
Having the PropertyConfigura
Hello Paul,
Having the PropertyConfigurator set the default category is an important and rather
invasive change. I am uncomfortable with it especially because there is no way to
override it. I would like to have it commented out until we find a better solution.
Regards, Ceki
At 07:49 04.0
This would be troublesome if multiple extensions were in use within the
same JVM. I do provide an alternative (referred to as "very manual
configuration" in the package javadocs) that leaves the hierarchy alone.
Unfortunately, this does not occur automatically (as implied by the name
"very manual
