[GUMP@lsd]: logging-log4j/log4j-tests failed

2004-05-06 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help understanding the request please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration, and has been ou

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

2004-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: New feature request: Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileA ppender

2004-05-06 Thread Paul Smith
Yup, and there is already a CylicBuffer & CyclicBufferList classes available in log4j to use for this (this is what the SMTPAppender uses). > -Original Message- > From: Simon Dorrat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 9:27 AM > To: 'Log4J Developers List' > Subject: RE:

RE: New feature request: Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileA ppender

2004-05-06 Thread Simon Dorrat
Thats an interesting requirement. I have never considered that before, but could imagine a few people wanting that. It could be an easy or difficult addition depending on which design pattern was used. (See the bugzilla history for the discussion of possible patterns between me and Paul). So if

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

2004-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Logging stack trace to a Database

2004-05-06 Thread Raymond DeCampo
James, Please see the PreparedStatementAppender class available in the log4j-sandbox via CVS at apache.org. It does support logging the stack trace to the database. Ceki has indicated that some form of this class will likely be included in log4j version 1.3. Now will be a good time for you t

Logging stack trace to a Database

2004-05-06 Thread James Stauffer
Title: Logging stack trace to a Database I would like my log messages logged to a Database with the stack trace.  It appears DBAppender (in 1.3) doesn't do that.  What is the best way to accomplish that?  I am willing to do the coding.  Two ideas that I had are: 1. Change DBAppender to suppor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

2004-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28647] - Add "Flush on Level" capability to FileAppender

2004-05-06 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP@lsd]: logging-log4j/log4j-tests failed

2004-05-06 Thread noreply
ant-xalan2.jar:/data3/gump/ant/dist/lib/ant-trax.jar:/data3/gump/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/data3/gump/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/data3/gump/dist/junit/junit.jar:/data3/gump/logging-log4j/log4j-chainsaw-20040506.jar:/data3/gump/logging-log4j/log4j-20040506.jar:/data3/gump/logging-log4j/log4j-lf5-200405