DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31662] New: - message property in LoggingEvent class not serializable

2004-10-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Kelly Kerr/Toronto/IBM is out of the office.

2004-10-11 Thread Kelly Kerr
I will be out of the office starting 10/11/2004 and will not return until 10/18/2004. I will respond to your message when I return. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Brandon Opfermann/Flagstar_notes is out of the office.

2004-10-11 Thread Brandon . Opferman
I will be out of the office starting 10/11/2004 and will not return until 10/18/2004. I will respond to your message when I return. This e-mail may contain data that is confidential, proprietary or "non-public personal information", as that term is defined in the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (collec

Re: Logging Event Listener

2004-10-11 Thread Jim Moore
I'm unclear of how a "listening" system would be different than the NullAppender solution you proposed. Can you give an example? On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:58:18 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering, if it would be great to have in next r

Logging Event Listener

2004-10-11 Thread s.boutte
Hi,   I was wondering, if it would be great to have in next release of log4j a complete system Event/lIstener  for : -  Listening to appender events (AddAppenderEventListener , RemoveAppenderEventListener, fireAppenderEvent) -  Listening to log Events (AddLoggingEventLis

Re: Missing Priority.toPriority()

2004-10-11 Thread Ceki Gülcü
At 12:36 PM 10/11/2004, you wrote: On Monday 11 October 2004 18:04, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Hello Niclas, > > Just look at the docs: > > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/Priority.html Please don't beat up (kill?) the messenger ;o) I thought my previous was factual, a little c

Re: Missing Priority.toPriority()

2004-10-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Monday 11 October 2004 18:04, Ceki Gülcü wrote: > Hello Niclas, > > Just look at the docs: > > http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/Priority.html Please don't beat up (kill?) the messenger ;o) cannot resolve symbol symbol : method toPriority (java.lang.String,org.apache

Re: Missing Priority.toPriority()

2004-10-11 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hello Niclas, Just look at the docs: http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/Priority.html http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/Category.html#setPriority(org.apache.log4j.Priority) HTH, At 11:55 AM 10/11/2004, you wrote: Gang, I am trying to sort out Gump r

Missing Priority.toPriority()

2004-10-11 Thread Niclas Hedhman
Gang, I am trying to sort out Gump related build issues. The eyebrowse.tigris.org project has a build error in Gump; [javac] /usr/local/gump/public/workspace/eyebrowse/src/java/org/tigris/eyebrowse/util/EyebrowseLogger.java:108: cannot resolve symbol [javac] symbol : method toPriority (