Re: [VOTE] Additions to the Appender interface

2005-03-08 Thread Curt Arnold
Unless someone else wants to volunteer for the task, I'll back out the additions to the appender interface and the activateOptions rename. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33914] New: - Emulation of log4j's 1.2 DailyRollingFileAppender and RollingFileAppender

2005-03-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33914. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: logging-log4j/tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j MinimumTest.java

2005-03-08 Thread carnold
carnold 2005/03/08 16:40:34 Modified:tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j MinimumTest.java Log: Mark ttcc test deprecated since TTCCLayout is deprecated Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +7 -1 logging-log4j/tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j/MinimumTest.java Index:

Why was LoggingRepository.setThreshold(Level) deprecated?

2005-03-08 Thread Curt Arnold
When I was cleaning up the Appender interface reversion, I intentionally added deprecation warnings and then attacked them. While I was at it, I was surprised to discover that LoggerRepository.setThreshold(Level) had been deprecated. The deprecation occurred in the first UGLI commit last

Gump update

2005-03-08 Thread Curt Arnold
In the just completed Gump run, it appears that we able to change all the Gump projects that were using log4j 1.2 back to using the CVS HEAD of log4j without (obviously) breaking anything. I reviewed the outputs of projects that just broke today and none of them appeared to be log4j related.