Re: [VOTE] Release Overview

On May 12, 2005, at 6:44 PM, Andy McBride wrote: Hi, The current cvs head contains breaking changes including the removal of org.apache.log4j.jmx.HierarchyDynamicMBean, org.apache.log4j.spi.ErrorHandler and org.apache.log4j.spi.ErrorCode without any apparent replacement or deprecation cycle. N

RE: [VOTE] Release Overview

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 12 May 2005 19:18 > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Overview > > > On May 12, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: > >>> 3) Release a 1.4 version with the TRACE change and other fixes

Re: [VOTE] Release Overview

On Thu, 12 May 2005, Curt Arnold wrote: | | On May 12, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: | >>> 3) Release a 1.4 version with the TRACE change and other fixes | >>> that will | >>> make life happier for the user base (action item: determine the | >>> other | >>> changes). No major structural

Re: [VOTE] Release Overview

On May 12, 2005, at 12:05 PM, Yoav Shapira wrote: 3) Release a 1.4 version with the TRACE change and other fixes that will make life happier for the user base (action item: determine the other changes). No major structural changes. Just most "important" bugfixes. The base of the 1.4 code wo

RE: [VOTE] Release Overview

Hi, I largely agree with Jacob and Elias. However, I don't like the 1.4/1.5 discussion: jumping version numbers confuses users, as I found out first hand with Tomcat, even when there's good reasoning for it. > > 1) Release 1.2.11 with JMS build fix, maybe some other critical fixes > > (action ite

Re: [VOTE] Release Overview

After reading some of the responses to this, I think I have to agree with Elias. Trace is an addition, not a subtraction, so it shouldn't hurt anyone. Besides, previous Log4j-1.2.x releases have added features. I'm not sure why this should be any different? Given the fact that the head will ta

Re: [VOTE] Release Overview

On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 22:05 -0700, Mark Womack wrote: > 1) Release 1.2.11 with JMS build fix, maybe some other critical fixes > (action item: determine the other fixes). Timeframe is almost immediate, > within the next 2 weeks. Agree. > 2) Abandon the 1.3 version number, the main branch becom

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34889] - o.a.l.s.LoggerRepository.setThreshold(Level l) marked deprecated

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/spi LoggerRepository.java

carnold 2005/05/12 05:36:28 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/spi LoggerRepository.java Log: Bug 34889: Remove deprecated tag from LoggerRepository.setThreshold Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +0 -1 logging-log4j/src/java/org/apache/log4j/spi/LoggerRepository.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34889] New: - o.a.l.s.LoggerRepository.setThreshold(Level l) marked deprecated

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Overview

I was just thinking the same thing. Relabeling the 1.3 as 1.5 gives us the option to do an interim minor release and have something to call it even if the decision to actually prepare a release to occupy that number was deferred. And it also preserves the big 2.0 for bigger changes (so lo

Re: [VOTE] Release Overview

Mark, I appreciate your energy you have at the moment, it's inspiring. On 12/05/2005, at 3:05 PM, Mark Womack wrote: 2) Abandon the 1.3 version number, the main branch becomes version 1.5 below. If we do this, we should probably post some rationale to the rest of the community, everyone's been