Re: JUnit Errors in 1.2.11 build

2005-06-01 Thread Curt Arnold
On Jun 2, 2005, at 12:33 AM, Mark Womack wrote: I am running the test cases against the 1.2.11 code, and the minimum case fails right off the bat: Minimum: [junit] Running org.apache.log4j.MinimumTestCase [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.501 sec [juni

cvs commit: logging-log4j/tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j/rolling/helper FileNamePatternTestCase.java

2005-06-01 Thread carnold
carnold 2005/06/01 22:48:57 Modified:src/java/org/apache/log4j/pattern ClassNamePatternConverter.java LoggerPatternConverter.java LoggingEventPatternConverter.java src/java/org/apache/log4j/rolling

JUnit Errors in 1.2.11 build

2005-06-01 Thread Mark Womack
I am running the test cases against the 1.2.11 code, and the minimum case fails right off the bat: Minimum: [junit] Running org.apache.log4j.MinimumTestCase [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.501 sec [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.log4j.MinimumTestCase [juni

cvs commit: logging-log4j build.xml

2005-06-01 Thread mwomack
mwomack 2005/06/01 21:49:13 Modified:.Tag: v1_2-branch build.xml Log: Cosmetic changes. Changes javac to use target attribute of 1.1. Per the Ant documentation: "Generate class files for specific VM version (e.g., 1.1 or 1.2). Note that the default value depends on the J

Re: Any interest in a Nagios Appender?

2005-06-01 Thread Paul Smith
If you package it up with an Apache 2 License, and post it as a bugzilla entry, I'm sure the very least it could go in the contrib area? cheers, Paul On 02/06/2005, at 5:50 AM, Jar Lyons wrote: I would be willing to contribute an appender that will mimick the nsca protocol. I have a demons

RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver

2005-06-01 Thread Scott Deboy
NDC is supported DBReceiver doesn't process serialized logging events, so it doesn't have the problem. The problem is that serialization of the LoggingEvent class changed in 1.3, so the old LoggingEvent class can't be serialized into the new LoggingEvent class This isn't a Receiver problem spe

RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver

2005-06-01 Thread Vernier, Dominique (DVernier)
Does it support NDC? Does the DBReceiver have the same problem? Does the problem at the Receiver class level? -Original Message- From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 June 2005 20:12 To: Log4J Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver It pro

Any interest in a Nagios Appender?

2005-06-01 Thread Jar Lyons
I would be willing to contribute an appender that will mimick the nsca protocol. I have a demonstration version that works just fine, tho only without encryption at the moment. -- Jar Lyons Software Engineer Mobliss Inc. [ http://www.mobliss.com ] 206-332-1749 ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35159] New: - Support serial compatibility of LoggingEvent between 1.2.x and 1.3

2005-06-01 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver

2005-06-01 Thread Scott Deboy
It probably needs to be added. -Original Message- From: Mark Womack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 6/1/2005 11:03 AM To: 'Log4J Developers List' Cc: Subject:RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver Should we have a bug entered for this issue? Or is there already one? -Mark

RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver

2005-06-01 Thread Mark Womack
Should we have a bug entered for this issue? Or is there already one? -Mark > -Original Message- > From: Scott Deboy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 10:50 AM > To: Log4J Developers List > Subject: RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver > > The (serialized) events you s

RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver

2005-06-01 Thread Scott Deboy
The (serialized) events you send to Chainsaw V2 from a log4j1.2.x framework (jmsappender and socketappender) must not contain MDC or location info because of changes to the LoggingEvent class. This should be resolved prior to the official 1.3 release. Scott -Original Message- From:

RE: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver

2005-06-01 Thread Vernier, Dominique (DVernier)
Title: Message I noticed that I received this message only after restarting the chainsaw   Level DEBUG Logger org.apache.log4j.chainsaw.receivers.ReceiversTreeModel Time 2005-06-01 19:32:27,694 Thread Thread-2 Message [EMAIL

Chainsaw and JMS Receiver

2005-06-01 Thread Vernier, Dominique (DVernier)
Title: Chainsaw and JMS Receiver Hi, In chainsaw I setup a JMSReceiver, the JMSReceiver is active and the Level is set-> well setup, but when I send message from the JMSAppender nothing happen. I don't see any additional tab. The messages are well send by the JMSAppender, I check it wit