Re: [COMPATIBILITY] Current state

I've written up the bugs, though I must admit the detail is rather minimal as I was pressed for time. -- Jess Holle Mark Womack wrote: Jess, can you write these 2 up as bugs? Thanks for the review! -Mark On 2/4/06, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Another issue: log4j 1.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38548] - SecurityExceptions when attempting to use in applet in Java 5 Plug-In

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38548] New: - SecurityExceptions when attempting to use in applet in Java 5 Plug-In

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38547] New: - DailyRollingFileAppender no longer extends FileAppender

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Individual contributor licence agreement

On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 13:02 -0600, Curt Arnold wrote: > On Feb 6, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Mark Womack wrote: > > > Yep. Thanks, Curt. > > > > So, we had talked about putting Elias' new stuff in the sandbox. Are > > we still good with that as a start? > > > > -Mark > > I'm good with it and could take

Re: Individual contributor licence agreement

On Feb 6, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Mark Womack wrote: Yep. Thanks, Curt. So, we had talked about putting Elias' new stuff in the sandbox. Are we still good with that as a start? -Mark I'm good with it and could take a pass at it if you'd like to me. Elias has definitely waited long enough.

Re: Individual contributor licence agreement

Yep. Thanks, Curt. So, we had talked about putting Elias' new stuff in the sandbox. Are we still good with that as a start? -Mark On 2/6/06, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Mark Womack wrote: > > > Elias, > > > > Sometimes the feedback about the submitte

Re: Individual contributor licence agreement

On Feb 6, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Mark Womack wrote: Elias, Sometimes the feedback about the submitted license is not great, but if you faxed it in, I'm sure Jim (ASF Secretary) has processed it. There is a page where one can see if the license has been received. I can't seem to find the web link

Re: Individual contributor licence agreement

Elias, Sometimes the feedback about the submitted license is not great, but if you faxed it in, I'm sure Jim (ASF Secretary) has processed it. There is a page where one can see if the license has been received. I can't seem to find the web link to it, but it I can look it up in a svn repo when I

Re: Log4jRequestedFeature for FileAppender

On Feb 6, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Patrick Vedrines wrote: hi, It's quite convenient to use Log4j for writing 'special' log messages into a 'Excel-like' file with the .xls extention . The pattern layout can contain tab delimited values in order to build a csv file, directly accessible via the h

Individual contributor licence agreement

I've been waiting to contribute some code for Log4j 1.3 and was told to send a signed a ICLA document. I faxed and later snail-mailed my ICLA (http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt) but haven't heard back. I e- mailed [EMAIL PROTECTED] and haven't head back. Is there a phone number I might ca

Re: [VOTE] Release log4j 1.3alpha8

Official release of 1.3alpha8 is in limbo due to concerns by the PMC about the intermittent FileWatchdog test failures in Gump. I looked at addressing the failures on Saturday, but did not reach a solution as it is hard to actually reproduce the failure. We'll either address the failures or relea

Re: [COMPATIBILITY] Current state

Jess, can you write these 2 up as bugs? Thanks for the review! -Mark On 2/4/06, Jess Holle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another issue: > > log4j 1.3 alpha 8 triggers throws SecurityExceptions when you attempt to > use it from within an applet in a Java 5 JVM. > > [It attempts to read a system pr

Log4jRequestedFeature for FileAppender

hi, It's quite convenient to use Log4j for writing 'special' log messages into a 'Excel-like' file with the .xls extention . The pattern layout can contain tab delimited values in order to build a csv file, directly accessible via the http server with the proper mime-type information (i.e. ask