DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17862] - Version.getVersion() method requested

2006-03-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17862. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j (in module logging-log4j) failed

2006-03-02 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j (in module logging-log4j) failed

2006-03-02 Thread Mark Womack
This must be because of my build.xml changes around version. But where in the gump specs does it say that the build variable version will be replaced by @@DATE@@? I changed the variable used in all the jar names from version to fullVersion, so I am guessing this is the issue. I can change it

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j (in module logging-log4j) failed

2006-03-02 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j (in module logging-log4j) failed

2006-03-02 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

Re: 1.3-alpha-9 build

2006-03-02 Thread Curt Arnold
On Mar 2, 2006, at 1:02 AM, Mark Womack wrote: I will be doing the build tomorrow night (3/2). If you have any checkins or updates to the HISTORY.txt, please get them in before 6pm US Pacific time. thanks, -Mark I saw that the Version class and versionInfo was added and it seems

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17862] - Version.getVersion() method requested

2006-03-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17862. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Log4j wiki under attack?

2006-03-02 Thread Ceki Gülcü
Hello all, I am not 100% sure but it looks like the log4j wiki is under attack by a guy named pavanbhagavatula. He has been adding spurious pages to the wiki. Apache infra should be able to suggest a defensive measure. From: Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 02

Re: 1.3-alpha-9 build

2006-03-02 Thread Mark Womack
A -1 before I even to do the build. :-) I'm fine with not doing the build. I'll spend my time this evening doing more cleanup and tests. That makes the next planned build the one at the end of this month. I changed the watchdog tests to output the (hopefully) relevant output to the console so

Re: Log4j wiki under attack?

2006-03-02 Thread Mark Womack
I deleted the recently added pages. We'll see where it goes from there. thanks, Ceki. -Mark - Original Message - From: Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Log4J Developers List log4j-dev@logging.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 11:07 AM Subject: Log4j wiki under attack?

svn commit: r382647 - in /logging/log4j/trunk: ./ docs/ src/java/org/apache/log4j/ tests/ tests/src/java/org/apache/log4j/

2006-03-02 Thread mwomack
Author: mwomack Date: Thu Mar 2 20:09:38 2006 New Revision: 382647 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382647view=rev Log: Undoing the Version addition and build changes Removed: logging/log4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/log4j/Version.java

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17862] - Version.getVersion() method requested

2006-03-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17862. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.