DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17862.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project logging-log4j has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
This must be because of my build.xml changes around version. But where in
the gump specs does it say that the build variable version will be
replaced by @@DATE@@? I changed the variable used in all the jar names from
version to fullVersion, so I am guessing this is the issue. I can change it
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project logging-log4j has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project logging-log4j has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On Mar 2, 2006, at 1:02 AM, Mark Womack wrote:
I will be doing the build tomorrow night (3/2). If you have any
checkins or updates to the HISTORY.txt, please get them in before
6pm US Pacific time.
thanks,
-Mark
I saw that the Version class and versionInfo was added and it seems
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17862.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello all,
I am not 100% sure but it looks like the log4j wiki is under attack by a
guy named pavanbhagavatula. He has been adding spurious pages to the wiki.
Apache infra should be able to suggest a defensive measure.
From: Apache Wiki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 02
A -1 before I even to do the build. :-)
I'm fine with not doing the build. I'll spend my time this evening
doing more cleanup and tests. That makes the next planned build the
one at the end of this month.
I changed the watchdog tests to output the (hopefully) relevant output
to the console so
I deleted the recently added pages. We'll see where it goes from there.
thanks, Ceki.
-Mark
- Original Message -
From: Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Log4J Developers List log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 11:07 AM
Subject: Log4j wiki under attack?
Author: mwomack
Date: Thu Mar 2 20:09:38 2006
New Revision: 382647
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=382647view=rev
Log:
Undoing the Version addition and build changes
Removed:
logging/log4j/trunk/src/java/org/apache/log4j/Version.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17862.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
12 matches
Mail list logo