Re: Enhanced FileAppender

2006-10-04 Thread Curt Arnold
On Oct 4, 2006, at 4:22 PM, Leo Lima wrote: Hello, Curt. I agree with you on almost all of them, but: A configurable limit on the number of writers open at any one time. A configurable limit on the time a writer will rename open without any writes. It would be something like 'whichever

Re: Enhanced FileAppender

2006-10-04 Thread Leo Lima
Hello, Curt. "Curt Arnold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu na mensagem news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'll try to flesh out a sandbox project for this at ApacheCON US 's > Hackathon next week. I don't know of any other log4j developers that > will be there, but at least one log4net developer will be at

Re: Enhanced FileAppender

2006-10-04 Thread Curt Arnold
I'll try to flesh out a sandbox project for this at ApacheCON US 's Hackathon next week. I don't know of any other log4j developers that will be there, but at least one log4net developer will be attending. It would be nice if the design could support the existing functionality of KeyFileAp

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

2006-10-04 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project logging-log4j-tests (in module logging-log4j) failed

2006-10-04 Thread noreply
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue