I've just committed the start of a multifile appender project as
recently discussed on the list. The project is not functional yet,
for example, it doesn't contain any appenders at the moment. Hope to
fill those in over the next few days. What is in there at the moment
is the FileNamePol
Author: carnold
Date: Tue Oct 10 20:12:24 2006
New Revision: 462679
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=462679
Log:
Initial commit
Added:
logging/sandbox/log4j/multifile/
logging/sandbox/log4j/multifile/LICENSE
logging/sandbox/log4j/multifile/NOTICE
logging/sandbox/log4
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Heri et al.,
Jumping in on this thread a little late, I believe that the decorator
pattern would offer a significant advantage because it would handle
derivatives of the FileAppender class such as RollingFileAppender. On
the down side, in order to configure the embedded file appender,
MultiFileAp
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project logging-log4j-tests has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
