On Nov 7, 2007, at 10:22 PM, Will Sargent wrote:
Curt Arnold wrote:
I did take a scan of the code, it does appear to conform to ASF
source header policy (http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html).
It also stated that it was based on log4j 1.3. log4j 1.3
development has been abandoned
Curt Arnold wrote:
I did take a scan of the code, it does appear to conform to ASF source
header policy (http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html).
It also stated that it was based on log4j 1.3. log4j 1.3 development
has been abandoned. I assume that it could be modified to work with
lo
> Collaborative software development is a key tenet of the ASF and code
> that is developed in isolation may need to come through the
> incubator. Ideally, new code contributions start with a "hey, I was
> thinking about " message and some initial discussion and then
> maybe a proof of concept
On Nov 7, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:
Okay, I'm about ready to fall over, but I looked at zeroconf and
see your motivation for moving the binding onto the main thread so
you continue the set up in
ZeroConfSocketHubAppender.activateOptions. However instead of
changing the behavi
