Re: Up-to-date build instructions for Apache chainsaw?

2008-06-26 Thread Oliver Frietsch
Update: With the no tests parameter for each one, I can build both the extras companion and Chainsaw itself, but a Chainsaw run attempt later on just gives me: Exception in thread main java.lang.Error: Unresolved compilation problems: LogManager cannot be resolved

svn commit: r672042 - /logging/log4j/companions/extras/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/log4j/rolling/CompositeTriggeringPolicyTest.java

2008-06-26 Thread psmith
Author: psmith Date: Thu Jun 26 15:27:04 2008 New Revision: 672042 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=672042view=rev Log: Replace Assert import with standard package. Really not sure why this is not required on the maven command line, but Eclipse refuses to find it for some reason.

Re: Up-to-date build instructions for Apache chainsaw?

2008-06-26 Thread Paul Smith
Anyway, I'm still not successful. The extras companion does not want to compile either. I attached the output. Is it possible that the junit package is missing?! I can't really believe that, as I guess that it is used by the other packages' tests, too. This is bizarre. On the command

Re: Up-to-date build instructions for Apache chainsaw?

2008-06-26 Thread Jacob Kjome
Paul Smith wrote: At the moment, Chainsaw has it's own hard-coded registry of 'potential' Receivers that are known, and checks which ones can be loaded. Ideally we would replace that with the standard JAR service provider stuff so any custom Receivers could be placed in the Plugin directory

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45274] not all the records are logged when using two different machines logging in the same file

2008-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45274 Jacob Kjome [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45274] not all the records are logged when using two different machines logging in the same file

2008-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45274 --- Comment #2 from Ralph Goers [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-06-26 21:26:22 PST --- writing to a file from two JVMs is indeed supported by Java. The problem is that in order to do so the file must be locked while the writes are taking place.

[jira] Commented: (LOG4J2-4) Prefer java.nio to java.io

2008-06-26 Thread Ralph Goers (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12608651#action_12608651 ] Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-4: -- File locking should be a configurable option to allow