DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45304] using log4j with OAS for some reasone all the logging activty hangs from all the applications deployed

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45304 --- Comment #2 from Amgad Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 00:49:09 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) Please provide additional information on this issue. Can you provide a small example which behaves like you describe? I'm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45304] using log4j with OAS for some reasone all the logging activty hangs from all the applications deployed

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45304 --- Comment #3 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 03:53:43 PST --- Please provide the property file you use, and a thread dump (JVM and OS dependant) of OC4J of the situation where logging has stopped. My guess

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42171] SocketHubReceiver duplicates messages

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42171 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45304] using log4j with OAS for some reasone all the logging activty hangs from all the applications deployed

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45304 Amgad Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22212|application/octet-stream|text/plain

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45304] using log4j with OAS for some reasone all the logging activty hangs from all the applications deployed

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45304 --- Comment #5 from Amgad Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 04:33:08 PST --- I'll provide the thread dump as soon as the hanging starts -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

svn commit: r673744 - /logging/log4j/companions/receivers/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/log4j/db/CustomSQLDBReceiver.java

2008-07-03 Thread sdeboy
Author: sdeboy Date: Thu Jul 3 10:49:08 2008 New Revision: 673744 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=673744view=rev Log: Update the customsqldbreceiver javadoc to make it even more clear that the user's db columns don't have to have the same name/contain all of the same columns (can be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40990] Cannot bind port or ip address for outgoing UDP socket when using SysLogAppender

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40990 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42851] Adding Goto Line feature to Chainsaw log panel

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42851 --- Comment #4 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 12:45:00 PST --- Is there any pending actions on this bug report? I understand that the patch correcting the original issue has been applied, so it might be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39691] DBAppender doesn't log long events

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39691 --- Comment #2 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 12:50:23 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) Truncation should be the resposibility of the appender, since it has the domain knowledge on the length to trim at.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45335] New: NDC.remove NullPointerException

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45335 Summary: NDC.remove NullPointerException Product: Log4j Version: 1.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42851] Adding Goto Line feature to Chainsaw log panel

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42851 Scott Deboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44700] Log4J locks rolled log files

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44700 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44765] SyslogAppender should not attempt to remove inital tabs from stack trace lines

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44765 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37182] Exception from exception toString() causes log4j to fail

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37182 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43403] PatternLayout: new format modifer: prefix if non-empty

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43403 --- Comment #2 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 13:12:06 PST --- If the functionality is available with other layouts, and the original poster has not pursued this further, perhaps it would be reasonable to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41547] PropertyConfigurator and layout.contentType

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41547 --- Comment #1 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 13:14:18 PST --- Could you please provide sample code demonstrating the issue you are reporting? Preferrably as an attached zipfile -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45231] Clear appenders call on logger calls a helper which calls close on the appenders

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231 --- Comment #1 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 13:37:24 PST --- Please attach a testcase demonstrating the behaviour you are reporting. -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 44765] SyslogAppender should not attempt to remove inital tabs from stack trace lines

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44765 Morten Hattesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43867] NOPLoggerRepository error during shutdown

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43867 --- Comment #14 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 13:40:25 PST --- From what I understand from the comments this is basically a Tomcat issue, and will not be circumvented in log4j 1.2? Would it be reasonable

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42189] Add simple bridge for java.util.logging, with basic Configurator support

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42189 --- Comment #13 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 13:45:33 PST --- I don't think it is a good idea to replicate the work that has been done with slf4j regarding gluing logging frameworks together. I believe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38590] no space on device fails another instance

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38590 --- Comment #1 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 13:53:06 PST --- Please provide log4j configuration file for your scenario plus the disk layout provoking this issue. -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36384] Configuring triggering/ rolling policies should be supported through properties

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36384 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43874] SocketHubAppender should expose actual port in use to extending classes

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43874 --- Comment #2 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 14:32:05 PST --- Is the issue still present, or can this issue be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45231] Clear appenders call on logger calls a helper which calls close on the appenders

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231 --- Comment #2 from David Berkman [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 14:32:48 PST --- (In reply to comment #1) Please attach a testcase demonstrating the behaviour you are reporting. You've got to be kidding. It's directly in your code.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40068] Add support for attach-on-demand API to chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068 --- Comment #2 from Curt Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 15:32:44 PST --- The basic idea is that the decision to use ChainSaw could be after-the-fact. JConsole currently supports this sort of usage. The API has changed since I filed

Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread Paul Smith
One of the last tasks to complete before a potential 'release' to the Webstart version of Chainsaw is building a custom Receiver artifact output that does not include the JMSReceiver DBReceiver, both of which require dependent jars that we obviously can't ship (because we don't know what

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43874] SocketHubAppender should expose actual port in use to extending classes

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43874 Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

RE: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread Scott Deboy
+1 Not sure about the name chainsaw-receivers (they can be used outside Chainsaw). Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40068] Add support for attach-on-demand API to chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068 --- Comment #3 from Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 15:55:48 PST --- Listing the running VM's on the local box is easy, it would mean a change to Chainsaw to depend on Java 6, but +1000 from me. Then what does one do with

Re: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread Paul Smith
On 04/07/2008, at 8:54 AM, Scott Deboy wrote: +1 Not sure about the name chainsaw-receivers (they can be used outside Chainsaw). I'm all ears on suggestions! :) I think it blows too, but my brain is tired this morning. Paul

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42189] Add simple bridge for java.util.logging, with basic Configurator support

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42189 --- Comment #14 from Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 16:04:55 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) I don't think it is a good idea to replicate the work that has been done with slf4j regarding gluing logging frameworks together.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40068] Add support for attach-on-demand API to chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068 --- Comment #4 from Scott Deboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 16:05:43 PST --- JMX for that part? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: ---

RE: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread Scott Deboy
log4j-receivers-3rdpartydeps? pretty hokey but a bit more accurate Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax:503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com -Original

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40068] Add support for attach-on-demand API to chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068 --- Comment #5 from Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 16:07:27 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) JMX for that part? That would mean the Appenders would have to be exposed as managed objects in the JMX namespace, which might

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39691] DBAppender doesn't log long events

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39691 --- Comment #3 from Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 16:40:30 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) Truncation should be the resposibility of the appender, since it has the domain

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 45231] Clear appenders call on logger calls a helper which calls close on the appenders

2008-07-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231 Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL

Re: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Paul Smith skrev den 04-07-2008 00:46: One of the last tasks to complete before a potential 'release' to the Webstart version of Chainsaw is building a custom Receiver artifact output that does not include the JMSReceiver DBReceiver, both of which require dependent jars that we obviously

Re: Receivers artifacts and Chainsaw

2008-07-03 Thread Paul Smith
On 04/07/2008, at 9:59 AM, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote: Paul Smith skrev den 04-07-2008 00:46: One of the last tasks to complete before a potential 'release' to the Webstart version of Chainsaw is building a custom Receiver artifact output that does not include the JMSReceiver