https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282
--- Comment #13 from Curt Arnold 2010-08-05 23:03:14 EDT
---
Any thoughts on how to write tests around this? What specific things fail with
the current class loader that would pass with the modified class loader? Are
there potential othe
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282
Craig Ziesman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[email protected]
--
Conf
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282
--- Comment #12 from Craig Ziesman 2010-08-05
16:11:42 EDT ---
My team has created an OSGi friendly version of Log4j. Unfortunately, it's not
as simple as adding the right headers to the manifest because there are
classloader issues when u
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282
--- Comment #11 from Craig Ziesman 2010-08-05
16:10:00 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25852)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25852)
manifest.bnd
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userp
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282
--- Comment #10 from Craig Ziesman 2010-08-05
16:02:53 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25851)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25851)
Log4jActivator.java
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzill
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282
--- Comment #9 from Craig Ziesman 2010-08-05
16:01:25 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=25850)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25850)
Loader.java
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userpre
Paul Glezen us.ibm.com> writes:
>
>
> Hi Nidhi,
> The log4j distribution includes a "deepExtension.html" document in the docs
directory. It is a bit out of date (my fault), but it includes some tips for
extending various portions of log4j.
> - Paul
> Paul Glezen
> Consulting IT Specialist
>
