[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264292#comment-13264292
]
Christian Grobmeier commented on LOG4J2-30:
---
Thank you Ralph.
I am +1 on
hi folks
i tried to close this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-30?focusedCommentId=13264292#comment-13264292
b/c there is no discussion and ralph as main developer already removed
the author tags
Unfortunately I have no super ninja mutant hero turtle super powers to
do it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Grobmeier closed LOG4J2-57.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
GSoC application time is over :-(
GSoC Ideas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-30?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13264300#comment-13264300
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on LOG4J2-30:
---
+1 to remove author tags.
Thanks Ralph for explaining the background on this.
Actually I am for version 3. It confuses me to see at leats 3 numbers
in the name. Imaging the following version number: log4j2 2.2.2-BETA2
gives me headache.
My current fave for version numbers is http://semver.org/
As you already mentioned,
Hi,
just fixed the docs, which said, log4j2 is looking for log4j.xml /
log4j-test.xml.
It is actually looking for log4j2.xml and log4j2-test.xml
I couldn't find the code if log4j.json is looked up or log4j2.json.
Unfortunately the system param to give an alternate file as config file is:
Wow - it is really great to have you digging into this.
Did you look at
http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/manual/configuration.html? It has two
sample json configuration files and talks about what you need to do to use
arrays. In particular, the loggers section looks like
loggers:
See below -
On Apr 28, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hi,
just fixed the docs, which said, log4j2 is looking for log4j.xml /
log4j-test.xml.
It is actually looking for log4j2.xml and log4j2-test.xml
Yes, that is correct. Thanks for fixing it.
I couldn't find the code if
hey ralph,
its a pleasure. I like that code and it is impressive that you wrote i
mostly alone
I have found an error on this page. There is a sample like that:
loggers: {
logger: { name: EventLogger, level: info,
additivity: false, appender-ref: { ref: Routing }},
root: { level:
These are all very good points If you would look at
http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/index.html as one example page and help
figure out how to change it so that when we are at log4j 2.1.2 the page doesn't
feel awkward because it is talking about 2.0 then I'd be OK with this. I
OK - I could swear that I copied the examples straight from unit tests. See
log4j-routing.json and log4j-routing2.json.
Ralph
On Apr 28, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
hey ralph,
its a pleasure. I like that code and it is impressive that you wrote i
mostly alone
I have
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
OK - I could swear that I copied the examples straight from unit tests. See
log4j-routing.json and log4j-routing2.json.
Actually you did. Something is wrong here...
log4j-routing.json:
loggers: {
logger: {
What is the problem?
Ralph
On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
OK - I could swear that I copied the examples straight from unit tests. See
log4j-routing.json and
the first example uses an object as logger value,
the second one an array with objects.
I understood it so that only the array option should work?
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Ralph Goers
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
What is the problem?
Ralph
On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:03 PM,
No. You can have multiple distinct objects or an array since both end up with
multiple logger objects.
Ralph
On Apr 28, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
the first example uses an object as logger value,
the second one an array with objects.
I understood
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org wrote:
No. You can have multiple distinct objects or an array since both end up with
multiple logger objects.
OK. So does that mean I can have either one object in the key logger
or an array? That would make sense.
Ralph
On
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Ralph Goers rgo...@apache.org wrote:
Are you getting confused as to when the type element is required? If so,
reread the section on the configuration page.
No, thats not what bugs me. I understand that.
I am fighting with this log4j2.json configuration and
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
These are all very good points If you would look
at http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/index.html as one example page
and help figure out how to change it so that when we are at log4j 2.1.2 the
page doesn't
I think a global change in the doc from log4j2 to log4j 2 would be fine. I'm
busy with my grand kids today and part of tomorrow so if you'd like to handle
it that would be fine.
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 28, 2012, at 2:18 PM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28,
As you may have noticed there are a couple of pages in the manual that I have
not completed. One of these is on extending Log4j2. Since you've been doing
some work in that area I'm wondering if you would mind making a first pass at
that page?
Ralph
Well, It may not be obvious Christian, but this question was meant for you.
Ralph
On Apr 28, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
As you may have noticed there are a couple of pages in the manual that I have
not completed. One of these is on extending Log4j2. Since you've been doing
some
21 matches
Mail list logo
