I'll put together a list of things that I think could be pulled out of
log4j-core because they are integrations with other tools. Go ahead and
throw darts, that's what my list is for.
* log4j-jms
* log4j-mail
* log4j-web
* log4j-jpa
* log4j-mongodb
* log4j-couchdb
Some more questionable ones to p
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> I agree with all that as well. Part of the "no more modules" problem comes
> from all the unnecessary OSGi modules. I'll be deleting those soon as I'm
> porting over the OSGi metadata to the appropriate modules so that extra
> parallel module
I agree with all that as well. Part of the "no more modules" problem comes
from all the unnecessary OSGi modules. I'll be deleting those soon as I'm
porting over the OSGi metadata to the appropriate modules so that extra
parallel modules are unneeded.
On 17 April 2014 23:48, Ralph Goers wrote:
Ralph,
Wiadomość napisana przez Ralph Goers w dniu 17 kwi
2014, o godz. 22:22:
> 2. I could swear we have always generated the OSGi MANIFEST.MF and people
> said it wasn’t sufficient, but if they aren’t there then I guess I am wrong.
Main reason why I joined log4j-dev is OSGi related stuff. So
