Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.5 rc1

Use https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1017 On 7 December 2015 at 10:32, Mikael Ståldal wrote: > Would it be possible to expose the artifacts in some publicly available > Maven repository? That would make it easier to test it. > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:11 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.5 rc1

Would it be possible to expose the artifacts in some publicly available Maven repository? That would make it easier to test it. On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > +1 > > Tested with our projects. > > On 6 December 2015 at 19:46, Ralph Goers > wrote: > >> This is a vote to rele

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.5 rc1

+1 Tested with our projects. On 6 December 2015 at 19:46, Ralph Goers wrote: > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.5, the next version of the Log4j 2 > project. > > Please download, test, and cast your votes on the log4j developers list. > [] +1, release the artifacts > [] -1, don't release becau

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-1213) How to configure log4j2.xml to write JPA queries with parameters to the server console

Rajasekhar Reddy created LOG4J2-1213: Summary: How to configure log4j2.xml to write JPA queries with parameters to the server console Key: LOG4J2-1213 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1213

[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-1212) Update documentation of defaults for AsyncLogger.WaitStrategy AsyncLoggerConfig.WaitStrategy

Philip Aston created LOG4J2-1212: Summary: Update documentation of defaults for AsyncLogger.WaitStrategy AsyncLoggerConfig.WaitStrategy Key: LOG4J2-1212 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1212

Early-access build b95 of JDK 9 is available for download

Hi Nick, Early-access builds of JDK 9 with Project Verona [0] in b95 are available for download here . The goal of this Project is to implement the new JDK version string as described in JEP-223 [1]. The new version-string sc

Re: [NOTICE] people.apache.org web space is moving to home.apache.org

How about SSHFS? http://fuse.sourceforge.net/sshfs.html On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 4:36 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > Would definitely like rsync support. > > On 5 December 2015 at 21:21, sebb wrote: > >> On 6 December 2015 at 02:01, Roman Shaposhnik >> wrote: >> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:32 PM, sebb