+1
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:08:43 +0100, Ceki Gülcü <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> While performing some tests with Tomcat, I noticed that if log4j.jar
> is placed in ./common/lib/, then for example an instance of
> SMTAppender cannot be created without placing 'mail.jar' also in
>
+1, I support Curt's candidacy
-Jim Moore
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm unclear of how a "listening" system would be different than the
NullAppender solution you proposed. Can you give an example?
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 16:58:18 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I was wondering, if it would be great to have in next r
[X] Yes, move LF5 into log4j-attic
[ ] No, keep LF5 as is.
[ ] Abstain
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm unclear how what you're asking for isn't handled by
RollingFileAppender, but all of the major appenders are pretty easy to
customize. In your log4j.properties/xml file you'd just specify your
new class instead of the standard one.
- Original Message -
From: Onyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D
Check the FAQ: http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/faq.html#2.9
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:22:05 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I am trying to use Log4j to figure out a way to dynamiclly use a different appender
> depending on the severity level. For example,
or prime-time and haven't seen
any real initiative at Apache to actually install/use them to help manage
the information.
Now if we could just convince a VP in the Apache Software Foundation
([cough] Ceki [cough]) to champion such an idea... :-)
-Jim Moore
- Original Message --
st "looks bad" that log4j doesn't have it.
So while I don't see a real need for it, I am slightly in favor of it
primarily for reasons of helping the way log4j is perceived -- justified or
not.
-Jim Moore
- Original Message -
From: "Ceki Gülcü" <[EMAIL PROTEC
;d only have a few dozen Loggers, which would have minimal impact.
But, as always, build a good program first, then profile.
-Jim Moore
From: Garg, Nidhi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 11:36 PM
To: 'Log4J Developers List'
S
