Greetings to all,
As a result of discussions held on this list and on commons-dev, I
think starting a new project based on or similar to UGLI outside
Apache Logging Services would benefit the wider OS community.
For one, many open source projects based on GPL or LGPL licenses
refuse to adopt log4j
By the way, suggestions for the project names are also welcome.
At 02:33 PM 4/6/2005, you wrote:
Greetings to all,
As a result of discussions held on this list and on commons-dev, I
think starting a new project based on or similar to UGLI outside
Apache Logging Services would benefit the wider OS
Will this allow us to continue to include UGLI in Log4j.jar or will it be
required to be a separate jar? Also, what are our plans for UGLI? I haven't
followed the commons-dev list. Is there any new information being provided
there as to JCL's plans? Is UGLI part of it? If we continue with
Hi All,
The set of people actually interested in working on JCL seems to have
dwindled back to two again (at least for the moment): Robert Donkin and
myself. And I´m still on holiday until this time next week; I´m
following the email discussions but can´t do any active work on things
now.
log4j.jar would almost certainly include the code of the new project
in the same way it includes UGLI. As such, I'd also expect the new
project to replace UGLI.
As for JCL, there are very encouraging signs that commons-dev
participants are becoming more and more aware of the problems
associated
options. I'm sorry I have not been able to keep up with the latest JCL
discussions, so I am commenting in that vacuum.
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 5:34 AM
To: log4j-dev@logging.apache.org
Subject: [POLL] Moving UGLI
Simon,
Thank you for your informative input which is highly appreciated. I agree
with what you wrote so won't add anything except extend a firm invitation
for your participation in the new project when it comes to being.
At 06:36 PM 4/6/2005, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi All,
The set of people
I haven't gotten deep into UGLI, however as far as I know there was not
an UGLI adapter for log4j 1.2, but required log4j 1.3. Since I expect
that it will take some time for log4j 1.3 to displace 1.2, any UGLI or
JCL like project in the interim should be able to support the deployed
versions
