Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-21 Thread Ralph Goers
Thanks, Christian. Yes, the logo should have the TM. The best way is to add it to the logo itself, but I have not had much luck with that in the past. I think I will probably create a beta1 branch so we can fix some of the web site issues after the release. Oh. And here is my +1. Ralph On

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello, +1 Great job Ralph! In addition to Ivans comments i have only recognized the following: - NOTICE/NOTICE.txt have different content - Do we need a TM on the log4j logo with the cup (right side)? Cheers Christian On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > This is a vote to r

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-20 Thread Gary Gregory
Sorry guys, I just started moving house, so I cannot take a look ATM. G On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > This vote is coming up on 48 hrs and has not had any feedback from PMC > members yet, although Christian did ping me offline to say he would try to > get to this by tomo

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-20 Thread Ralph Goers
apache, therefore unsure. > > Thanks, > Viral Shah > (c): 312 375 2629 > AIM: budmiller75 > Yahoo/Skype: virals3 > > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:37 AM > To: Log4J Developers List > Cc: Log

RE: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-20 Thread Viral Shah
: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:37 AM To: Log4J Developers List Cc: Logging PMC Subject: Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1 This vote is coming up on 48 hrs and has not had any feedback from PMC members yet, although Christian did ping me offline to say he would try to get to this by tomorrow. Can

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-20 Thread Ralph Goers
This vote is coming up on 48 hrs and has not had any feedback from PMC members yet, although Christian did ping me offline to say he would try to get to this by tomorrow. Can one of the other PMC members please review the release? Thanks, Ralph On Sep 18, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-19 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 (non binding) 2012/9/18 Ralph Goers : > This is a vote to release Log4j 2.0-beta1, the third release of Log4j 2.0. > > Changes in this release include: > > New features: > o Added AsynchAppender. > > Fixed Bugs: > o LOG4J-81: PatternLayout was not honoring format modifiers. > o Created web mod

[VOTE] Log4j 2.0-beta1 rc1

2012-09-18 Thread Ralph Goers
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.0-beta1, the third release of Log4j 2.0. Changes in this release include: New features: o Added AsynchAppender. Fixed Bugs: o LOG4J-81: PatternLayout was not honoring format modifiers. o Created web module to allow web applications to include the Log4j context